(05-15-2012, 01:10 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: And if your personal vantage point sees a society that is underachieving, then you are enjoying a destructive vibration.

(05-15-2012, 01:23 PM)Pickle Wrote:

(05-15-2012, 01:10 PM)3DMonkey Wrote: And if your personal vantage point sees a society that is underachieving, then you are enjoying a destructive vibration.

That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. LMAO!

How do you create by "allowing"? Just allowing the streams of life to pass by you is not balance, it is apathy.

Balance is the correct reaction to actions. And yes there is a correct/incorrect reaction.

Polarization is the point of this game, you may want to jump into the game sometime.

(05-15-2012, 12:22 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Then ask oneself the question- would it be possible for physical lifeforms to exist such that the natural biological functions of each only served to support the biological function of the others?

TN out.

(05-15-2012, 11:19 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I do not believe that someone else should appoint authority in the sense that you mean it. That is just the way it is with human relations unfortunately.

but if you truly believe that for the betterment of your incarnation you need to end the incarnation of another, than that would be the reason why the human relationship is in need of authority and governing.

What would be the opportunity for you to share and evolve if, by your belief system, you became the last of your kind? Because if we all thought this way, and death to others was our motto for life, and it was followed to the limit, at some point we would eliminate all others.

I choose to believe that was not what you meant. but your wording seemed to lead in that direction. Instead of speculating on what you meany it is probably best for you to further elucidate.

You say that you have stated the same before so it sounds like you know what you are stating.

You said, "All entities in physicality must end the incarnation of another to sustain their own incarnation."UNQUOTE

Can you go into a little more detail here Valtor?

(06-27-2012, 03:51 AM)Cyan Wrote: I've felt that I should transition to a "reproduction only" diet.

And by that I mean any product of the animal/plant kingdom that is produced directly or indirectly through reproductive means.

Milk, cheese, eggs, caviar, berries, fruits etc. Anything that when the production takes place the plant or animal should feel a sense of happiness naturally.

I feel that such a diet would, if nothing else, significantly boost my red ray intake and help me balance out my otherwise sedentary lifestyle as most of what i eat now is indirectly from death.

(05-15-2012, 12:12 PM)Patrick Wrote:

(05-15-2012, 11:19 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I do not believe that someone else should appoint authority in the sense that you mean it. That is just the way it is with human relations unfortunately.

but if you truly believe that for the betterment of your incarnation you need to end the incarnation of another, than that would be the reason why the human relationship is in need of authority and governing.

What would be the opportunity for you to share and evolve if, by your belief system, you became the last of your kind? Because if we all thought this way, and death to others was our motto for life, and it was followed to the limit, at some point we would eliminate all others.

I choose to believe that was not what you meant. but your wording seemed to lead in that direction. Instead of speculating on what you meany it is probably best for you to further elucidate.

You say that you have stated the same before so it sounds like you know what you are stating.

You said, "All entities in physicality must end the incarnation of another to sustain their own incarnation."UNQUOTE

Can you go into a little more detail here Valtor?

Not for the betterment, but simply for your incarnation to continue, you must end the incarnation of another entity. Plants are incarnated beings, as are the bacteria and the simple cells within the milk and the eggs. You cannot live in physicality without taking the life of another entity. Unless you can live on prana alone.

(06-27-2012, 11:30 AM)ShinAr Wrote:

(05-15-2012, 12:12 PM)Patrick Wrote:

(05-15-2012, 11:19 AM)ShinAr Wrote: I do not believe that someone else should appoint authority in the sense that you mean it. That is just the way it is with human relations unfortunately.

but if you truly believe that for the betterment of your incarnation you need to end the incarnation of another, than that would be the reason why the human relationship is in need of authority and governing.

What would be the opportunity for you to share and evolve if, by your belief system, you became the last of your kind? Because if we all thought this way, and death to others was our motto for life, and it was followed to the limit, at some point we would eliminate all others.

I choose to believe that was not what you meant. but your wording seemed to lead in that direction. Instead of speculating on what you meany it is probably best for you to further elucidate.

You say that you have stated the same before so it sounds like you know what you are stating.

You said, "All entities in physicality must end the incarnation of another to sustain their own incarnation."UNQUOTE

Can you go into a little more detail here Valtor?

Not for the betterment, but simply for your incarnation to continue, you must end the incarnation of another entity. Plants are incarnated beings, as are the bacteria and the simple cells within the milk and the eggs. You cannot live in physicality without taking the life of another entity. Unless you can live on prana alone.

But you are talking about nurturing the physical body.

The All is sustained by Prana alone.

(06-27-2012, 03:31 PM)Cyan Wrote: When i think of a cow being milked when i eat cheese it feels like, to be honest, sort of like a mammaly gland orgasam. IT feels like the cow had a nice big helping of orgasm from being milked and i am eating it energy of its release to sustain myself.