+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16)
+--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7)
+--- Thread: Mankind vs HuMankind (/showthread.php?tid=1927)
Mankind vs HuMankind - BrownEye - 12-08-2010
In my personal queries I had a moment of shock at the answer MANkind will cease to exist on this planet in the future. After changing terminology I found that HUMANkind will continue, while MANkind ends. After getting around the two terms I tried to get an idea of what the difference is and it seems MAN=animal while HuMAN=something to do with the idea of God.
Trying to find info to correlate with my own findings did not amount to a whole lot.
According to the best efforts of linguists and researchers, the root of the present word God is the Sanskrit word hu which means to call upon, invoke, implore.
http://wahiduddin.net/words/name_god.htm
This explains the words in the Bible, "Except a man be born of water and the spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God." In the word "huma", "hu" represents spirit, and the word "mah" in Arabic means water. In English the word "human " explains two facts which are characteristic of humanity: "hu" means God and "man" means mind, which word comes from the Sanskrit "mana", mind being the ordinary person. The two words united represent the idea of the God-conscious person; in other words HU, God, is in all things and beings, but it is man by whom He is known. "Human " therefore may be said to mean God-conscious, God-realized, or God-man.
http://www.sourcetext.com/hupage/Sufi/sufi0.html
http://knol.google.com/k/sound-archetype-hu#
http://open.salon.com/blog/suresh_emre/2010/08/28/sound_archetype_hu
I assume this has something to do with the evolution we are supposed to go through?
RE: Mankind vs HuMankind - Brittany - 12-08-2010
I am thinking more in concepts than words here. It seems obvious that, through our evolution, our form and the way we see ourselves in general will change. We will eventually lay down these heavy chemical bodies for lighter, energetic ones. Our minds will continue to evolve into infinity as we grow closer to oneness with the Creator. But we will still be us. The same way an adult is, in a way, still the child he once was, but with additional growth and experience. We will not cease to be, but we will get to a point that life as we know it here would seem cumbersome and we will be ready to move on. I agree that we are moving out of orange-ray animal concepts of gathering resoures and protecting the tribe, into the green ray vibration of the open heart. We are indeed learning of our own divinity.
RE: Mankind vs HuMankind - Plenum - 01-30-2012
(12-08-2010, 03:47 PM)Pickle Wrote: In my personal queries I had a moment of shock at the answer MANkind will cease to exist on this planet in the future. After changing terminology I found that HUMANkind will continue, while MANkind ends. After getting around the two terms I tried to get an idea of what the difference is and it seems MAN=animal while HuMAN=something to do with the idea of God.
this is possibly the transition from 3d to 4d physical bodies?
mankind --> humankind ?
Ra suggests that our current 3d earth will be UNINHABITED for some period of time post-Harvest:
Quote:As the green-ray cycle or the density of love and understanding begins to take shape the yellow-ray plane or Earth which you now enjoy in your dance will cease to be inhabited for some period of your space/time as the space/time necessary for fourth-density entities to learn their ability to shield their density from that of third is learned. After this period there will come a time when third-density may again cycle on the yellow-ray sphere.
- -
RE: Mankind vs ManUnkind - Dekalb_Blues - 03-29-2012
PITY THIS BUSY MONSTER, MANUNKIND
pity this busy monster, manunkind,
not. Progress is a comfortable disease:
your victim (death and life safely beyond)
plays with the bigness of his littleness
--- electrons deify one razorblade
into a mountainrange; lenses extend
unwish through curving wherewhen till unwish
returns on its unself.
A world of made
is not a world of born --- pity poor flesh
and trees, poor stars and stones, but never this
fine specimen of hypermagical
ultraomnipotence. We doctors know
a hopeless case if --- listen: there's a hell
of a good universe next door; let's go
E. E. Cummings