![]() |
Wikipedia - Printable Version +- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums) +-- Forum: Bring4th Community (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=16) +--- Forum: Olio (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=7) +--- Thread: Wikipedia (/showthread.php?tid=2950) |
Wikipedia - Technarch - 07-05-2011 I'd like to see a Wikipedia article on 4th Density. In order to do this, there should be a concerted effort to start and maintain articles despite the initial negative reaction such articles will cause. Wikipedia editors will be too tired/overwhelmed to simply delete everything once a proper cabal is formed to watch over and vote on pages. The first step is to un-redirect Carla Rueckert and L/L Research and provide more neutral sources to support the articles. Channeling should have its own article instead of directing to Mediumship, and can exist as a sub-topic of "New Age". The article on New Age is too vague and undefined, but it can still mention Law of One material, and existing New Age topics can link to Law of One topics, showing it's about more than Ancient Astronauts. Templates need to be created to show that how all concepts are linked and serve as important topics for whatever the template is about, such as a template on Channeling with links to different channeling authors and concepts related to channeling. Promote channeling as a set of beliefs/claims with neutral sources reaffirming those claims. There are plenty of articles on the occult, mythology, religion and obscure comic book characters that don't fit into the verifiable scientific mindset, as each topic is presented as is and left alone for dedicated fans to edit and add to, as long as the articles are presented well and have survived many battles for deletion. Be one of those editors that keeps voting for keep and keeps arguing for the inclusion of the article. You may want to set a date and time to synchronize the creation and maintenance of these articles so the editors are too busy/tired to delete all of them as they are bombarded with enough interrelated topics, each supporting the many ideas and concepts found in channeling. Keep persisting. This is war. RE: Wikipedia - Technarch - 07-06-2011 Other examples: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seth_Material http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ascended_Master_Teachings http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Urantia_Book http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mysticism http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Wilcock http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_icke http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgar_Cayce RE: Wikipedia - Tenet Nosce - 07-15-2011 (07-06-2011, 01:26 AM)Technarch Wrote: Other examples:[This is my 111th post on Bring4th.org] Very intriguing concept! You seem to also have a broad knowledge of the Cassiopean, Bashar, and Nibiruan Council transmissions. Additional transmissions may be found at Channeled Updates on GalacticFriends.com I recently addressed a transmission of Hatonn in the pre- and post- Ra transmissions to L/L Research as it compares to this June 11, 2011 transmission through Matthew and Suzy Ward. Do you suppose it is possible to arrive at some sort of syncretic agreement amongst these various sources? I would also offer these resources: Fringe Knowledge for Beginners Chasing Phantoms A Channeling Handbook A Wanderer's Handbook The Law of One Study Guide The Shift of the Ages The Science of Oneness The Divine Cosmos Wanderer Awakening The Reincarnation of Edgar Cayce Why Most Affirmations Fail RE: Wikipedia - Tenet Nosce - 07-15-2011 (07-15-2011, 04:48 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(07-06-2011, 01:26 AM)Technarch Wrote: Other examples:[This is my 111th post on Bring4th.org] I think this Ra quote bears some weight: Quote:Questioner: So we have the distinct possibility of two different types of catalyst creating an atmosphere of seeking that is greater than that which we experience at present. There will be much confusion, especially in the scenario of Earth changes simply because there have been many predictions of these changes by many groups giving many and sundry reasons for the changes. Can you comment on the effectiveness of this type of catalyst and the rather wide pre-knowledge of the coming changes but also the wide variation in explanation for these changes? RE: Wikipedia - Technarch - 07-16-2011 All channeled material from different sources could fit the "Channeling" template, with the Law of One being one of the many articles, hopefully lowering its chances of being singled out. A few articles could fit shared ideas and themes such as Density. There just needs to be enough neutral sources to support them all. |