Bring4th
The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Science & Technology (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=5)
+--- Thread: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites (/showthread.php?tid=3469)



The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 10-27-2011

Rather luckily 'stumbled' upon this.

Part 1 (following parts are linked on the right of YouTube page)...



Carl uses The Great Pyramid as a new reference for Longitude and Latitude, and rather convincingly shows how ancient sites are (very) accurately mathematically placed around the globe.

There is a lot of maths in it, although it is quite simple. Even if math is not your thing, it really doesn't matter, it's the results/conclusions that speak volumes.

He even gets to Mars, Cydonia.

Ra Wrote:we wished then to carefully guide the initiates in developing a healing of the people whom they sought to aid and the planet itself. Pyramid after pyramid charged by the crystal and initiate were designed to balance the incoming energy of the One Creation with the many and multiple distortions of the planetary mind/body/spirit. In this effort we were able to continue work that brothers within the Confederation had effected through building of other crystal-bearing structures and thus complete a ring, if you will, of these about the Earth’s, as this instrument would have us vibrate it, surface.



RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - zenmaster - 10-29-2011

Well, removing hundreds of other candidate sites and using different criteria for numerical-encoding 'matches', you can say you've 'unlocked' their message. Not impressed at all.




RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 10-30-2011

(10-29-2011, 12:51 PM)zenmaster Wrote: Well, removing hundreds of other candidate sites and using different criteria for numerical-encoding 'matches', you can say you've 'unlocked' their message. Not impressed at all.

I see your point, but it's one man, one effort - there could well be other links.

Ra was involved at Giza, and the Confederation at sites all over the world (see the quote in the first post), there may well be many hidden mathematics if one is inclined to search. That includes the possibility of different matches with different candidates.

In fact, I find the likelihood of such links highly probable - we're talking about entities from 6th density, beings who's grasp of third density geometry and mathematics are quite literally out of this world :¬)

Coming from a background in mathematics myself, I find much value in his discoveries. Far too many, 5 hour's worth, of 'coincidences', all based upon the same constants.

Each to his own, of course :¬)


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - zenmaster - 10-30-2011

(10-30-2011, 11:08 AM)Namaste Wrote: Coming from a background in mathematics myself, I find much value in his discoveries.

What particular value have you found in his discoveries? Maybe that's something to discuss, the value.


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 10-30-2011

(10-30-2011, 11:23 AM)zenmaster Wrote:
(10-30-2011, 11:08 AM)Namaste Wrote: Coming from a background in mathematics myself, I find much value in his discoveries.

What particular value have you found in his discoveries? Maybe that's something to discuss, the value.

The logic Carl uses to demonstrate the language in which the ancients spoke - the radian - and the resulting calculations just 'make sense'. Hard to quantify, as of course that is subjective.

In terms of the results of the calculations themselves, they are far too accurate (to five or more decimal places) to be random. For example, the results from quite obvious calculations using the ancient's constants, and the radian, equal global constants we know of today (circumference/radius) of the planet, along with other logical measurements at the other linked sites.

When you watch the full 5+ hours, it's hard to even think that all of the maths in there are coincidence. The chances of which much be one in billions (literally), as maths is precise. The calculations he presents are also very precise.


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - zenmaster - 10-30-2011

(10-30-2011, 12:10 PM)Namaste Wrote:
(10-30-2011, 11:23 AM)zenmaster Wrote:
(10-30-2011, 11:08 AM)Namaste Wrote: Coming from a background in mathematics myself, I find much value in his discoveries.

What particular value have you found in his discoveries? Maybe that's something to discuss, the value.

The logic Carl uses to demonstrate the language in which the ancients spoke - the radian - and the resulting calculations just 'make sense'. Hard to quantify, as of course that is subjective.

In terms of the results of the calculations themselves, they are far too accurate (to five or more decimal places) to be random. For example, the results from quite obvious calculations using the ancient's constants, and the radian, equal global constants we know of today (circumference/radius) of the planet, along with other logical measurements at the other linked sites.

When you watch the full 5+ hours, it's hard to even think that all of the maths in there are coincidence. The chances of which much be one in billions (literally), as maths is precise. The calculations he presents are also very precise.
Yes, I'm familiar with his presentation. But what value have you found in his discoveries? You said you found much value in them. What is the value?




RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 10-31-2011

Ah, I misunderstood your question :¬)

It verifies the above quote in the Ra Material (the Confederation being involved in placing/building structures all over the planet) and my own beliefs (a co-ordinated global effort from the Confederation in which to help mankind evolve, using a common language - mathematics - in which to link specific ritualistic and balancing sites).

Considering the link between Giza and the stars, and the maths encoded within in the Great Pyramid itself (read: Heaven's Mirror & Fingerprints of the Gods - Graham Hancock, The Orion Mystery - Robert Bauval among others), to me, it makes perfect sense that the sites themselves would be encoded with global planetary references.

So in short, it's value is the mathematical proof that the intelligence responsible for constructing these ancient sites was unified (i.e. the Confederation) and mathematically advanced.


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 11-18-2011

One other key note, Carl also points out that the pole has shifted over thousands of years, which effects the rather prominent 19.5 latitude on the globe.

He traces back the pole to 10,500BC, and at this date, Giza was placed upon the 19.5 location, making it sit directly on one of the planets power lines.

Being familiar with the Ra Material, you'll know that the pyramids are like a piano out of tune, it works, but nothing to the degree of it's original power; all due to earth changes.

Not to mention the date, exactly as Ra mentioned :¬)

Hence, much value. Scientific proof of a concept within the material.


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - C-JEAN - 11-18-2011

Hi, math fans.

It would be fun if China left us "work" with their pyramids.
It could confirm much, if not all, of what was deduced in the video.

Blue skies.



RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - AnthroHeart - 11-19-2011

Namaste, has the land shifted since 10,500 BC? Would the 19.5 be over the same area as it was then?


RE: The Code: A (fantastic) Mathematicians Analysis of Ancient Sites - Namaste - 11-25-2011

(11-19-2011, 04:44 PM)Gemini Wolf Wrote: Namaste, has the land shifted since 10,500 BC? Would the 19.5 be over the same area as it was then?

Yes it has shifted, as has magnetic north.

Skip to 55 mins my friend!

He hits the nail on the head at 57:50.

Clear proof in my opinion. He independently finds 10,500BC; Ra's words.

Quote:4.6 Questioner: Is the large pyramid at Giza still usable for this purpose, or is it no longer functional?

Ra: I am Ra. That, like many other pyramid structures, is like the piano out of tune. It, as this instrument would express, plays the tune but, oh, so poorly. The disharmony jangles the sensitive. Only the ghost of the streaming still remains due to the shifting of the streaming points which is in turn due to the shifting electromagnetic field of your planet

Ra Wrote:The use of the pyramid to balance planetary energies still functions to a slight extent, but due to earth changes, the pyramids are no longer aligned properly for this work.