(11-09-2012, 02:14 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:

)((I AM (THAT) I AM))(

Quote:(1.6)

Ra: I am Ra. Consider, if you will, that the universe is infinite. This has yet to be proven or disproven, but we can assure you that there is no end to your selves, your understanding, what you would call your journey of seeking, or your perceptions of the creation.

That which is infinite cannot be many, for many-ness is a finite concept. To have infinity you must identify or define that infinity as unity; otherwise, the term does not have any referent or meaning. In an Infinite Creator there is only unity. You have seen simple examples of unity. You have seen the prism which shows all colors stemming from the sunlight. This is a simplistic example of unity.

In truth there is no right or wrong. There is no polarity for all will be, as you would say, reconciled at some point in your dance through the mind/body/spirit complex which you amuse yourself by distorting in various ways at this time. This distortion is not in any case necessary. It is chosen by each of you as an alternative to understanding the complete unity of thought which binds all things. You are not speaking of similar or somewhat like entities or things. You are every thing, every being, every emotion, every event, every situation. You are unity. You are infinity. You are love/light, light/love. You are. This is the Law of One.

May we enunciate this law in more detail?

(11-11-2012, 08:47 AM)plenum Wrote: there is a passage in the Ra material that describes the quest for unity as being a higher calling that the quest for love; which some mistake for the Creator itself.

Ra, 27:12 Wrote:The term Love then may be seen as the focus, the choice of attack, the type of energy of an extremely, shall we say, high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in just such and such a way. This then may be seen to be an object rather than an activity by some of your peoples, and the principle of this extremely strong energy focus being worshipped as the Creator instead of unity or oneness from which all Loves emanate.

(11-12-2012, 04:19 AM)plenum Wrote: but I won't ask you to find that one

Quote:17.2 Questioner: Is it possible by the use of some technique or other to help an entity to reach fourth-density level in these last days?

Ra: I am Ra. It is impossible to help another being directly. It is only possible to make catalyst available in whatever form, the most important being the radiation of realization of oneness with the Creator from the self, less important being information such as we share with you.

(11-12-2012, 04:10 PM)plenum Wrote: oh, here we go Mr Tenet. Managed to find it after a few attempts.

Quote:17.2 Questioner: Is it possible by the use of some technique or other to help an entity to reach fourth-density level in these last days?

Ra: I am Ra. It is impossible to help another being directly. It is only possible to make catalyst available in whatever form, the most important being the radiation of realization of oneness with the Creator from the self, less important being information such as we share with you.

(11-12-2012, 04:19 AM)plenum Wrote: yes, that's the one Ankh.

there's also the one about the greatest catalyst or service one can offer in 3d is to embody the peace and calmness of one resting in unity consciousness. but I won't ask you to find that one

(11-12-2012, 04:10 PM)plenum Wrote: oh, here we go Mr Tenet. Managed to find it after a few attempts.

Quote:17.2 Questioner: Is it possible by the use of some technique or other to help an entity to reach fourth-density level in these last days?

Ra: I am Ra. It is impossible to help another being directly. It is only possible to make catalyst available in whatever form, the most important being the radiation of realization of oneness with the Creator from the self, less important being information such as we share with you.

(11-20-2012, 09:48 PM)kanonathena Wrote: If I regard love as the inherent property of Oneness, I wonder what other properties Oneness have.

I guess there is only one property of Oneness?