Bring4th
1D sphere - Printable Version

+- Bring4th (https://www.bring4th.org/forums)
+-- Forum: Bring4th Studies (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Strictly Law of One Material (https://www.bring4th.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: 1D sphere (/showthread.php?tid=9038)

Pages: 1 2


1D sphere - sunnysideup - 04-26-2014

Quote:11.4 Questioner: Is there a planet behind our sun, opposite to us in orbit, that we do not know about?
Ra: I am Ra. There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature, but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density.

I was wondering if Ra might be referring to what the International Astronomical Union calls dwarf planet. Maybe one of the more recent discovered dwarf planets in our solar system: Makemake (March 2005), Eris (January 2005) or Haumea (December 2004)?
I tend to daydream a lot and oftentimes, even in midst of reading, my imagination takes over and I perceive things spiced by my fantasy. Now when I first read Ra talking about this sphere with a very, very cold nature locked in 1D, I imagined this dark sphere roaming our solar system being literally everything opposite to our sun locked in 1D, much like a wanderer in a 3D. So I'm glad I started reading the Ra material a second time and just writing down the exact, if possible, translation. I now think Ra is referring to a dwarf planet with an extreme low surface tempature, maybe Eris which seems to have the overall lowest surface tempature. What do you think it is? A dwarf planet, meteorite or maybe something else?

1Love


RE: 1D sphere - Ankh - 04-26-2014

(04-26-2014, 08:42 AM)sunnysideup Wrote:
Quote:11.4 Questioner: Is there a planet behind our sun, opposite to us in orbit, that we do not know about?
Ra: I am Ra. There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature, but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density.

I was wondering if Ra might be referring to what the International Astronomical Union calls dwarf planet. Maybe one of the more recent discovered dwarf planets in our solar system: Makemake (March 2005), Eris (January 2005) or Haumea (December 2004)?
I tend to daydream a lot and oftentimes, even in midst of reading, my imagination takes over and I perceive things spiced by my fantasy. Now when I first read Ra talking about this sphere with a very, very cold nature locked in 1D, I imagined this dark sphere roaming our solar system being literally everything opposite to our sun locked in 1D, much like a wanderer in a 3D. So I'm glad I started reading the Ra material a second time and just writing down the exact, if possible, translation. I now think Ra is referring to a dwarf planet with an extreme low surface tempature, maybe Eris which seems to have the overall lowest surface tempature. What do you think it is? A dwarf planet, meteorite or maybe something else?

1Love

Since Ra said that "This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density", I think that it has of a size of a planet, but can not be called a planet because it is "locked" in 1D (whatever that means).


RE: 1D sphere - zenmaster - 04-26-2014

(04-26-2014, 08:42 AM)sunnysideup Wrote:
Quote:11.4 Questioner: Is there a planet behind our sun, opposite to us in orbit, that we do not know about?
Ra: I am Ra. There is a sphere in the area opposite your sun of a very, very cold nature, but large enough to skew certain statistical figures. This sphere should not properly be called a planet as it is locked in first density.

I was wondering if Ra might be referring to what the International Astronomical Union calls dwarf planet.
Don's interests, while mixed with some esoteric material, largely reflected the scientific mysteries and paranormal sub-collective interests contemporary to his seeking. Most likely he was referring to the Nemesis theory. Ra's explanations drew almost directly from Don's knowledge, sometimes enlarging on the ideas or correcting them, but sometimes seemingly, conveniently or indulgently offering confirmation of a suspicion.


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 04-26-2014

It's the gold atmosphere that makes it appear cold, whilst protecting the inhabitants from radiation.

Being a hollowed out shell of a planet explains the "locked in 1st density".
If it can "..not properly be called a planet", then what would be the correct name?


RE: 1D sphere - sunnysideup - 04-26-2014

are you maybe referring to our moon, Ashim?


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 04-27-2014

(04-26-2014, 02:04 PM)sunnysideup Wrote: are you maybe referring to our moon, Ashim?

No, another sphere.
Perhaps the one Dr. Mainzer from NASA refers to at about 1:00 into this video.



RE: 1D sphere - Guardian - 04-27-2014

Would a 1st density sphere be detectable to us in 3rd density?


RE: 1D sphere - sunnysideup - 04-27-2014

Quote:Being a hollowed out shell of a planet explains the "locked in 1st density". If it can "..not properly be called a planet", then what would be the correct name?

Thanks for sharing that link, Ashim.
I could only come up with our moon as supposedly being a hollowed out shell of a planet. Well I remembered it being mentioned in one of Bring4th threads.

Quote:Don's interests, while mixed with some esoteric material, largely reflected the scientific mysteries and paranormal sub-collective interests contemporary to his seeking. Most likely he was referring to the Nemesis theory. Ra's explanations drew almost directly from Don's knowledge, sometimes enlarging on the ideas or correcting them, but sometimes seemingly, conveniently or indulgently offering confirmation of a suspicion.

Thanks zenmaster and quite interesting this Nemesis theory. I was trying to find more online information on this matter and stumbled upon material which might very well be some of the esoteric material you were referring to. Seemingly the worshipping of a black sun or black dwarf has taken place throughout mankind's history with references to Atlantis, Nazi Germany and the Illuminati.




RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 08:39 AM)Guardian Wrote: Would a 1st density sphere be detectable to us in 3rd density?

Yes, with the WISE technology.
One must search in the infra-red spectrum, not just in the visible.

(04-27-2014, 08:49 AM)sunnysideup Wrote:
Quote:Being a hollowed out shell of a planet explains the "locked in 1st density". If it can "..not properly be called a planet", then what would be the correct name?

Thanks for sharing that link, Ashim.
I could only come up with our moon as supposedly being a hollowed out shell of a planet. Well I remembered it being mentioned in one of Bring4th threads.

Quote:Don's interests, while mixed with some esoteric material, largely reflected the scientific mysteries and paranormal sub-collective interests contemporary to his seeking. Most likely he was referring to the Nemesis theory. Ra's explanations drew almost directly from Don's knowledge, sometimes enlarging on the ideas or correcting them, but sometimes seemingly, conveniently or indulgently offering confirmation of a suspicion.

Thanks zenmaster and quite interesting this Nemesis theory. I was trying to find more online information on this matter and stumbled upon material which might very well be some of the esoteric material you were referring to. Seemingly the worshipping of a black sun or black dwarf has taken place throughout mankind's history with references to Atlantis, Nazi Germany and the Illuminati.


Hah, have been singing and playing this song on the guitar all day!!
Remember the dropped D tuning.


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-27-2014

First density means "dead matter" or "mineral life". The sphere has not cultivated complex molecules for plants and biological life.


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 11:18 AM)darklight Wrote: First density means "dead matter" or "mineral life". The sphere has not cultivated complex molecules for plants and biological life.

yes and "locked" means kept in that state by an external influence.
Ie, a hollowed out planet used as a space station.

Perhaps sent into an excentric orbit as the result of a stellar incident.


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 03:58 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(04-27-2014, 11:18 AM)darklight Wrote: First density means "dead matter" or "mineral life". The sphere has not cultivated complex molecules for plants and biological life.

yes and "locked" means kept in that state by an external influence.
Ie, a hollowed out planet used as a space station.

Perhaps sent into an excentric orbit as the result of a stellar incident.

then there are countless of moons, astroids, comets and planets in the universe that locked in first density.


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 05:11 PM)darklight Wrote:
(04-27-2014, 03:58 PM)Ashim Wrote:
(04-27-2014, 11:18 AM)darklight Wrote: First density means "dead matter" or "mineral life". The sphere has not cultivated complex molecules for plants and biological life.

yes and "locked" means kept in that state by an external influence.
Ie, a hollowed out planet used as a space station.

Perhaps sent into an excentric orbit as the result of a stellar incident.

then there are countless of moons, astroids, comets and planets in the universe that locked in first density.

To be "locked" requires those who do the "locking".

Most celestial objects could be seen as developing, only some being "locked".


RE: 1D sphere - anagogy - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 11:18 AM)darklight Wrote: First density means "dead matter" or "mineral life". The sphere has not cultivated complex molecules for plants and biological life.

I agree with you that a sphere locked in 1st density does not contain plants or biological life.

I just wanted to state for clarity's sake (for whoever likes to think about this stuff) that anything we see, whether it be organic, or inorganic, is of the 1st density vibrational spectrum. All we are capable of physically perceiving is 1st density. Even when looking at a 2nd density being, or a 3rd density being, we are only seeing the 1st density component of that being. The 2nd and 3rd density components are not, properly, of the spectrum of physicality we are familar with via our typical physical senses.


RE: 1D sphere - sunnysideup - 04-27-2014

1st density is also an illusory pattern so my guess would be that all we ever really perceive is light.


RE: 1D sphere - anagogy - 04-27-2014

(04-27-2014, 09:12 PM)sunnysideup Wrote: 1st density is also an illusory pattern so my guess would be that all we ever really perceive is light.

Yep. It's just Beingness looking at Beingness.

[Image: 600px-Ouroboros-simple.svg_-e1338767769638.png]


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-28-2014

When atoms form more and more complex molecules, on a certain moment it will cross the density barrier.

I remember that Ra said that some beings are able to transform their 3th density body in a light body without the physical death. Perhaps the "12 strands dna activation theory" is true, but only for a few people.


RE: 1D sphere - zenmaster - 04-29-2014

(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: When atoms form more and more complex molecules, on a certain moment it will cross the density barrier.


Can you explain how you arrived at that conclusion?

(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: I remember that Ra said that some beings are able to transform their 3th density body in a light body without the physical death.
Where in the material did Ra say this?


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-30-2014

(04-29-2014, 09:44 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: When atoms form more and more complex molecules, on a certain moment it will cross the density barrier.


Can you explain how you arrived at that conclusion?

(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: I remember that Ra said that some beings are able to transform their 3th density body in a light body without the physical death.
Where in the material did Ra say this?

I believe between the densities, there in intelligent infinity. For example if beings, like 2D animals, are on the highest sub-octave, they have the ability to graduate to the next density through intelligent infinity.


Ra didn't say that, it was my misstake. It is a notice from David Wilcock, I read that on an Dutch translation of the LOO.


RE: 1D sphere - zenmaster - 04-30-2014

What is it about the complexity of molecules that allow them to cross the density barrier?


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-30-2014

(04-30-2014, 12:12 PM)zenmaster Wrote: What is it about the complexity of molecules that allow them to cross the density barrier?

The complexity of a molecule is based on experiencing/learning in space time. If it sufficient evolve, it can expand its complexity in the next density through intelligent infinity.

Many, many of these molecules can "serve" as human DNA for the foetus for example.


RE: 1D sphere - darklight - 04-30-2014

As additional info, we can't eat everything on this planetary surface such like rocks, so we need consume suitable food to keep maintaining this bodely complex. The body uses suitable molecules to activate protein biosynthesis to keep this body alive. We can understand that all is serve the One, from the smallest particle to entire galaxies.


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 05-01-2014

(04-29-2014, 09:44 PM)zenmaster Wrote:
(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: When atoms form more and more complex molecules, on a certain moment it will cross the density barrier.


Can you explain how you arrived at that conclusion?

(04-28-2014, 05:40 AM)darklight Wrote: I remember that Ra said that some beings are able to transform their 3th density body in a light body without the physical death.
Where in the material did Ra say this?

It's more to do with core rate vibration of the photon.
In 4th density the photon spins faster. Thus an octave is created in a for 3d invisible or infra red spectrum.

Ra offers a strong nudge and hint with this regarding the light body.

Quote:48.10 Questioner: Could you tell me how the various bodies, red through violet, are linked to the energy center, centers, red through violet? Are they linked in some way?
Ra: I am Ra. This shall be the last full query of this working.

As we have noted, each of the true-color densities has the seven energy centers and each entity contains all this in potentiation. The activation, while in yellow ray, of violet-ray intelligent infinity is a passport to the next octave of experience. There are adepts who have penetrated many, many of the energy centers and several of the true colors. This must be done with utmost care while in the physical body for as we noted when speaking of the dangers of linking red/orange/yellow circuitry with true-color blue circuitry the potential for disarrangement of the mind/body/spirit complex is great. However, the entity who penetrates intelligent infinity is basically capable of walking the universe with unfettered tread.



RE: 1D sphere - zenmaster - 05-01-2014

Infra red spectrum? The EM spectrum is 1D space/time only. The next "octave" here means density, which includes 4D space/time AND time/space. However, there is no 4D time/space nor 4D space/time body transfer without physical death of the 3D body.

Also where do you get the idea that photon spin rate is related to core vibration rate?


RE: 1D sphere - anagogy - 05-01-2014

I would say the increase in complexity of the material structure is a result, or effect, of the increase in consciousness level rather than the cause of being a higher density energy pattern.


RE: 1D sphere - Ashim - 05-02-2014

(05-01-2014, 08:43 AM)zenmaster Wrote: Infra red spectrum? The EM spectrum is 1D space/time only. The next "octave" here means density, which includes 4D space/time AND time/space. However, there is no 4D time/space nor 4D space/time body transfer without physical death of the 3D body.

Also where do you get the idea that photon spin rate is related to core vibration rate?

I meant ultraviolet. Duhhh.
I'm sure that once polarity is worked off that the 'death' of the physical body is not required for entry into 4d space/time or time/space.

What else would "unfettered tread" mean, the chains or bindings to 3rd density having been freed?


RE: 1D sphere - sunnysideup - 05-03-2014

Quote:Questioner: Could you tell me about this first density of planetary entities?

Ra: I am Ra. Each step recapitulates intelligent infinity in its discovery of awareness. In a planetary environment all begins in what you would call chaos, energy undirected and random in its infinity. Slowly, in your terms of understanding, there forms a focus of self-awareness. Thus the Logos moves. Light comes to form the darkness, according to the co-Creator’s patterns and vibratory rhythms, so constructing a certain type of experience. This begins with first density which is the density of consciousness, the mineral and water life upon the planet learning from fire and wind the awareness of being. This is the first density.

Questioner: How does this first density then progress to greater awareness?

Ra: I am Ra. The spiraling energy, which is the characteristic of what you call “light,” moves in a straight line spiral thus giving spirals an inevitable vector upwards to a more comprehensive beingness with regards to intelligent infinity. Thus, first dimensional beingness strives towards the second-density lessons of a type of awareness which includes growth rather than dissolution or random change.

Thanks for your input y'all.
Now as far as I understand the two excerpts above, a sphere locked in 1D could mean first dimensional beingness without progression into second-density type of awareness. But that makes me wonder as to why this sphere is in this state. Could perhaps the sphere's consciousness choose to remain in this state?
Also does the spiraling energy of light have some sort of counterpart? a reverse spiral giving a vector downwards? And if so, is this perhaps what we call dark matter?


RE: 1D sphere - anagogy - 05-03-2014

(05-03-2014, 10:53 AM)sunnysideup Wrote: Now as far as I understand the two excerpts above, a sphere locked in 1D could mean first dimensional beingness without progression into second-density type of awareness. But that makes me wonder as to why this sphere is in this state.

"This too may be seen to have been of concern to Logoi which were aware that without the need to understand, understanding would forever be left undone."

"The particular Logos of your major galaxy has used a large portion of Its coalesced material to reflect the beingness of the Creator. In this way there is much of your galactic system which does not have the progression of which you speak but dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos."


RE: 1D sphere - michael430 - 05-05-2014

[deleted]


RE: 1D sphere - AnthroHeart - 05-05-2014

Our bodies are 1D material and I'm sure I can see them. I think it's our consciousness that's 3D.