Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Healing Health & Diet New Roundup Study

    Thread: New Roundup Study


    native (Offline)

    Foolin' Around
    Posts: 2,414
    Threads: 71
    Joined: Dec 2010
    #1
    05-06-2013, 10:54 PM
    http://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/15/4/1416

    "Abstract: Glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup®, is the most popular herbicide used worldwide. The industry asserts it is minimally toxic to humans, but here we argue otherwise. Residues are found in the main foods of the Western diet, comprised primarily of sugar, corn, soy and wheat. Glyphosate's inhibition of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes is an overlooked component of its toxicity to mammals. CYP enzymes play crucial roles in biology, one of which is to detoxify xenobiotics. Thus, glyphosate enhances the damaging effects of other food borne chemical residues and environmental toxins. Negative impact on the body is insidious and manifests slowly over time as inflammation damages cellular systems throughout the body. Here, we show how interference with CYP enzymes acts synergistically with disruption of the biosynthesis of aromatic amino acids by gut bacteria, as well as impairment in serum sulfate transport. Consequences are most of the diseases and conditions associated with a Western diet, which include gastrointestinal disorders, obesity, diabetes, heart disease, depression, autism, infertility, cancer and Alzheimer’s disease. We explain the documented effects of glyphosate and its ability to induce disease, and we show that glyphosate is the “textbook example” of exogenous semiotic entropy: the disruption of homeostasis by environmental toxins."
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked native for this post:1 member thanked native for this post
      • Firewind
    Karl (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 658
    Threads: 32
    Joined: Oct 2012
    #2
    05-06-2013, 11:26 PM
    Awesome the western world is f*****.

      •
    Guardian (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 361
    Threads: 31
    Joined: Sep 2012
    #3
    05-07-2013, 12:54 AM
    Meanwhile in India... organic rice production shatters all records

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/global-develop...revolution
    [+] The following 4 members thanked thanked Guardian for this post:4 members thanked Guardian for this post
      • native, Ruth, Hototo, Firewind
    native (Offline)

    Foolin' Around
    Posts: 2,414
    Threads: 71
    Joined: Dec 2010
    #4
    06-21-2013, 11:11 AM
    The EPA wants to raise permitted glyphosate levels found on food and in drinking water. You have until July 1st to sign a petition being sent to the EPA. Their position is that glyphosate does not cause cancer. The study above contradicts that however.

    http://www.organicconsumers.org/bytes/ob384.html
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked native for this post:1 member thanked native for this post
      • Firewind
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #5
    06-21-2013, 01:01 PM
    Looks like another non-peer reviewed paper written by uncritical amateurs.
    http://skeptoid.com/blog/2013/05/04/roun...-bacteria/
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked zenmaster for this post:1 member thanked zenmaster for this post
      • Firewind
    Hototo Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 1,268
    Threads: 78
    Joined: Mar 2013
    #6
    06-21-2013, 01:11 PM
    Ahh skeptics, always funny.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Hototo for this post:1 member thanked Hototo for this post
      • Firewind
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #7
    06-21-2013, 01:24 PM
    (06-21-2013, 01:11 PM)Not Sure Wrote: Ahh skeptics, always funny.
    Yet critical thinking is sorely lacking in many articles such as these today, go figure.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked zenmaster for this post:1 member thanked zenmaster for this post
      • Firewind
    Hototo Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 1,268
    Threads: 78
    Joined: Mar 2013
    #8
    06-21-2013, 01:31 PM
    Looking at the original article. I agree entirely, critical thinking has not been at the forefront of these scientists.

    That being said, the skeptics article is a hoot to read, but probably not for the reasons intended. It reads like stuff from Westboro Babtist Church stuff with all that tongue in cheek ad hominems.
    [+] The following 2 members thanked thanked Hototo for this post:2 members thanked Hototo for this post
      • Jade, Firewind
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #9
    06-21-2013, 04:28 PM
    An exaggeration to be sure, but skepticism does tend to confuse the new age folks who do not care so much about critical thought but rather that their vague notion is propagted by any means necessary, even at the expense of honest methodology.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked zenmaster for this post:1 member thanked zenmaster for this post
      • Marc
    Guardian (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 361
    Threads: 31
    Joined: Sep 2012
    #10
    06-21-2013, 04:59 PM
    Here's 118 studies on the dangers of glyphosate

    http://www.greenmedinfo.com/toxic-ingred...-herbicide
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Guardian for this post:1 member thanked Guardian for this post
      • Hototo
    Hototo Away

    Account Closed
    Posts: 1,268
    Threads: 78
    Joined: Mar 2013
    #11
    06-21-2013, 06:04 PM
    (06-21-2013, 04:28 PM)zenmaster Wrote: An exaggeration to be sure, but skepticism does tend to confuse the new age folks who do not care so much about critical thought but rather that their vague notion is propagted by any means necessary, even at the expense of honest methodology.

    Wait wait wait....

    Are you serious?

    Hmm... Seems like there are a lot of unexpressed emotions and anger floating around here. Huh...

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #12
    06-21-2013, 06:11 PM
    (06-21-2013, 06:04 PM)Not Sure Wrote: Hmm... Seems like there are a lot of unexpressed emotions and anger floating around here. Huh...
    well then feel free to express your emotions and anger? Do you feel inhibited in some way?

      •
    native (Offline)

    Foolin' Around
    Posts: 2,414
    Threads: 71
    Joined: Dec 2010
    #13
    06-21-2013, 09:34 PM
    Well that's nice. I was of the impression it was peer-reviewed.

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #14
    06-21-2013, 10:08 PM
    (06-21-2013, 09:34 PM)Icaro Wrote: Well that's nice. I was of the impression it was peer-reviewed.
    No, it was not peer-reviewed. Peer review means working scientists in the field vet the paper, not merely the journal editors. One of the contributing authors is not even in the field. These days, anyone can create a journal and make up any publishing standards desired. Crap like this is like a roadblock or disservice to the search for legitimate knowledge. Meanwhile the fanatics will eat it up because it serves to reinforce their uncritical prejudices.

      •
    native (Offline)

    Foolin' Around
    Posts: 2,414
    Threads: 71
    Joined: Dec 2010
    #15
    06-21-2013, 10:39 PM
    Yes I know what peer-reviewed means. The way the website presents itself, I assumed everything was legitimate. Thanks for the heads up.

      •
    GentleReckoning (Offline)

    Death, the primal Alchemist
    Posts: 1,383
    Threads: 68
    Joined: Oct 2012
    #16
    06-21-2013, 11:27 PM
    I appreciate the spirit of the study. Wanton exposure to chemicals is BAD!!!

    Just like I feel that aliens are real and have a bias towards ufo's and other phenomena being related to that, so too I have a bias towards many food related things occurring in our world as well being good or bad.

    I'm very comfortable in this space.

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #17
    06-21-2013, 11:55 PM
    (06-21-2013, 11:27 PM)GentleReckoning Wrote: I appreciate the spirit of the study.
    That's what consequentialism is all about.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked zenmaster for this post:1 member thanked zenmaster for this post
      • xise
    C-JEAN (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 215
    Threads: 9
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #18
    06-22-2013, 01:33 PM
    Hi all.

    I did a little bit of mouse CLICKing, and:

    http://www.mdpi.com
    Quote:Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute,
    is a platform for peer-reviewed, scientific open-access journals operated by MDPI AG,
    based in Basel, Switzerland. MDPI publishes over 70 diverse open access electronic journals,
    including. . .

    MDPI - Open Access Publishing
    MDPI is a publisher of peer-reviewed, open access journals since its establishment in 1996.

    OAI-certified
    Open Archive Initiative data provider

    http://www.openarchives.org/Register/Bro...i/oai2.php

    Also interresting:
    http://www.mdpi.com/about/team

    Blue skies.

      •
    zenmaster (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 5,541
    Threads: 132
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #19
    06-22-2013, 04:10 PM
    C-JEAN, you're not going to find legitimate science articles by keyword searching the internet for 'peer-review', as all journals would want to provide that impression. There are other ways to look into the matter. Without training yourself, you can still learn a great deal about science just by reading actual science papers (well many) and get a feel for the general presentation style and methodology. A red flag is if the researchers are not part of the field being investigated. Another is if there are no studies conducted. Another is what prior research they are citing. Fails on all counts - so it's bullshit.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tamar-hasp...62694.html

      •
    C-JEAN (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 215
    Threads: 9
    Joined: Jan 2009
    #20
    06-24-2013, 10:37 PM
    Hi NO-roundup fans.

    On a parallele topic, GMO, here is an interresting story:
    ECO-REVOLUTION: GMO crops TORCHED in
    http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread955220/pg1

    I guess some of "them" had enough and acted on it !! B-)

    Blue skies.

      •
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode