Bring4th Forums
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:
  • Archive Home
  • Members
  • Team
  • Help
  • More
    • About Us
    • Library
    • L/L Research Store
User Links
  • Login Register
    Login
    Username:
    Password:

    Menu Home Today At a Glance Members CSC & Team Help
    Also visit... About Us Library Blog L/L Research Store Adept Biorhythms

    As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

    You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

    Bring4th Bring4th Studies Strictly Law of One Material Itzhak Bentov & The Law of One

    Thread: Itzhak Bentov & The Law of One


    shift.earth (Offline)

    Newbie
    Posts: 1
    Threads: 1
    Joined: May 2016
    #1
    05-30-2016, 08:10 PM
    Hi Everyone! I'm new to the forum. I've been working on a website www.shift.earth that correlates The Law of One with the works of Itzhak Bentov, in particular his book "A Brief Tour of Higher Consciousness." Please check out http://www.shift.earth/tnm.html for more information.

    The short of it is this:
    Law of One : Bentovian Cosmology
    Infinite Creator = Manifest Creation
    Infinite Intelligence = Cosmic Aleph
    First Distortion = Cosmic Will
    Second Distortion = Cosmic Love
    Third Distortion = Cosmic Creation

    I also believe that we can correlate Ben's universal time phases with the octaves of the spiritual densities. If we adjust the way Bentov labelled the phases and say there are seven phases total by counting the white hole as phase (or octave) one and the black hole universal center as phase (or octave) seven, then according to the Law of One vernacular, that would put the surface population of humanity in the third spiritual density of the third octave of universal time flow.

    There are deep and profound correlations between the Law of One and the cosmology of Itzhak Bentov. I believe any serious student of the Law of One would benefit from reading A Brief Tour.

    http://shift.earth/tnm.html
    http://www.amazon.com/Brief-Tour-Higher-...89281814X/


    Attached Files
    .png   bc-cosmos-v1-600.png (Size: 97.91 KB / Downloads: 16)
    [+] The following 6 members thanked thanked shift.earth for this post:6 members thanked shift.earth for this post
      • JustLikeYou, YinYang, Bring4th_Austin, Dekalb_Blues, Parsons, Jade
    Aion (Offline)

    Sentinel of the LVX Decad
    Posts: 4,760
    Threads: 45
    Joined: Apr 2015
    #2
    05-31-2016, 04:13 AM (This post was last modified: 05-31-2016, 04:17 AM by Aion.)
    I like Bentov, I read Stalking The Wild Pendulum and quite enjoyed it. I particularly liked how he correlated zero with infinity.
    [+] The following 1 member thanked thanked Aion for this post:1 member thanked Aion for this post
      • YinYang
    Dekalb_Blues (Offline)

    Member
    Posts: 885
    Threads: 12
    Joined: Mar 2012
    #3
    06-01-2016, 07:45 PM (This post was last modified: 12-13-2021, 02:30 AM by Dekalb_Blues.)
    Greetings shift.earth, good work on your treatment of Itzhak B.'s ontological models at your website. It's an excellent idea to bring him to the attention of this community of seekers.



    I first met Itzhak in 1982 at an intriguingly interdisciplinary Conference on Consciousness in NYC orchestrated by Vilayat Inayat Khan's quasi-Sufi organization. Featured were important personages in the then-fairly-new "New Age" movement-- including scientificals like visionary inventor Bentov, the great theoretical physicist Eugene Wigner, neuroscientist Karl Pribram (who with Wigner was big on the then-new "holographic universe" model of reality), mystic-state/hallucinogen researcher Jean Houston, Jungian psychologist June Singer, as well as divines like Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, Khan, and others [Bentov, Wigner, Singer, Reb Zalman, and Khan have since passed on]). Bentov's way of visualizing complex domains from a vibratory viewpoint with a childlike simplicity and lucidity is a wonderful thought-tool for those whose work depends on clarity and mental flexibility. Of course there are those who think he was still a bit mired in the fuddy-duddy classical-physical model:
    http://www.quantonics.com/A_Quantum_Pendulum.html
    This is perhaps understandable, however, in a non-academically-minded autodidact whose very real-worldly work in the invention of various complex gizmos designed for use in, say, concrete medical applications demanded close attention to What Concretely Actually Works regardless of what any particular ideological abstraction posited about How Things Theoretically Should Work. A lot of old-time Newtonian stuff is not currently held to be "sexy" like quantum-this or hyper-that  (the current miasmal chaos of advanced-physics ideas prematurely ripped from the sophisticated technically demanding context of a Ra or a Bashar or whoever), but it is nevertheless appropriate to most mortal terrestrials bound by Earthly gravitics and temporality, and not to be skipped over disrespectfully. Bentov's emphasis on the vibratory level of phenomena is instrumentally useful -- the most academically-acceptable hard-core professional physics is in that language, so to speak, so it is from that point that anything radically new in conception can be usefully brought under responsible scrutiny without the usual immediate dismissal as crack-pottery. Of course, most of the time the wonderful new thing is crack-pottery, but that's another psychoanthropological story (see, e.g., https://web.archive.org/web/201910242249...rchive.php).

    Incidentally, there is this slightly-piratical-but-nevertheless-all-in-a-good-cause resource for those who would like to peruse some of his various works gratis:
    Z-Library project ebooks site or Library Genesis2M ebooks site
    (Of course you will burn in Info-Pirate Hell forever, if not longer, for the heresy of circumventing The $ystem and its Conceptual Property Rights taboo-rites, so there's that to sneeringly ponder for several nanoseconds.)

    I.B.'s ca. 1978 presentation:


    Cheers. Cool


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    "[Insert devastatingly profound spiritually gung-ho quote here]" 
                       --- [Insert name of some insufferably pure being here]



    Just for the reciprocal heck of it:
    Works by Dewey B. Larson

    An interesting (and more politically-contextualized approach) to tricky things 'n' stuff,
    by a much-demonized polemical economist:
    "Science for Teachers -- Visualizing the Complex Domain"

    Keep this under your hat -- it's... The Answer!!!
    [Image: 4497763_0.jpg]

    The purpose of a system is what it does. There is after all, no point in claiming that the purpose of a system is to do what it constantly fails to do.
    --- Anthony Stafford Beer
    Diagnosing the System for Organizations (Wiley, 1985) p. 99
    [+] The following 2 members thanked thanked Dekalb_Blues for this post:2 members thanked Dekalb_Blues for this post
      • Plenum, fiatlux0
    « Next Oldest | Next Newest »

    Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)



    • View a Printable Version
    • Subscribe to this thread

    © Template Design by D&D - Powered by MyBB

    Connect with L/L Research on Social Media

    Linear Mode
    Threaded Mode