10-20-2012, 11:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-20-2012, 11:35 AM by Tenet Nosce.)
YESSSS! Love it!
:idea: 
Sure, wherever they are found. For example, we have noticed that a great many contentious points can be traced back to Session 17 and Session 63. I'm just suggesting it could be helpful to reconcile those kinds of points using the statement of Ra's nature and purpose in Session One.


(10-19-2012, 02:37 PM)Patrick Wrote:(10-18-2012, 03:45 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote: Secondly, I have proposed that, when an apparent discrepancy in the material or confusion arises, that 1.1 and 1.6 (NOT my restatements of them) be used to reconcile those differences. I would be interested to hear people's opinion on that proposition.
In the material in general ?
Sure, wherever they are found. For example, we have noticed that a great many contentious points can be traced back to Session 17 and Session 63. I'm just suggesting it could be helpful to reconcile those kinds of points using the statement of Ra's nature and purpose in Session One.