10-29-2012, 11:00 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-29-2012, 11:11 AM by Tenet Nosce.)
(10-29-2012, 12:51 AM)zenmaster Wrote:Quote:85.11: ...that which is not cannot endure throughout the octave of third density...Anyone have an opinion on the meaning of this statement?
I would first point out that there was another "oopsie" in the session that was corrected later. Thus, big red flag for confusion to ensue from this quote. For example, I noticed that the last two paragraphs of this quote are completely missing from the "differences" page.
Quote:85.11 Questioner: Then the service-to-others* path has potentiated that which is not. Could you expand that a little bit so that I could understand it a little better?
Ra: I am Ra. If you see the energy centers in their various colors completing the spectrum you may see that the service-to-others* choice is one which denies the very center of the spectrum; that being universal love. Therefore, all that is built upon the penetration of the light of harvestable quality by such entities is based upon an omission. This omission shall manifest in fourth density as the love of self; that is, the fullest expression of the orange and yellow energy centers which then are used to potentiate communication and adepthood.
When fifth-density refinement has been achieved that which is not is carried further, the wisdom density being explored by entities which have no compassion, no universal love. They experience that which they wish by free choice, being of the earnest opinion that green-ray energy is folly.
That which is not may be seen as a self-imposed darkness in which harmony is turned into an eternal disharmony. However, that which is not cannot endure throughout the octave of third density and, as darkness eventually calls the light, so does that which is not eventually call that which is.
* This should be service-to-self. Don and Ra corrected the error later in the session.
It is unclear here whether they are talking about third density as a sub-octave, or whether talking about the third density as a part of the octave.
Based on the context of the rest of this quote, and other parts of the material, they seem to be saying that denial of green-ray cannot endure much past fifth density. In which case, this is just a mangled sentence resulting from the distortion of Carla's pain flares during this session.
The alternative interpretation would suggest that it cannot endure past a sub-density of third density. Perhaps also the sixth? It's not really clear.
What we do know is that there are definitely those here now in our earth experience that appear rather devoid of compassion. So the pertinent question would be: which sub-density of third density is dominant at the moment?
(10-29-2012, 04:26 AM)zenmaster Wrote: My opinion is that STS orientation can not polarize in the higher sub densities of 3D.
Quote:To me this also implies that STO also can not polarize for harvest at completion of cycle without also completing the lessons of the 7th sub density.
But this would imply that those on the negative path graduate earlier from third density, leaving only those on the positive path to complete through the 7th sub-density.
That is interesting. But I want to make sure that is what you are saying here.
Also- according to your estimation, what would be the requirements for appreciation of the 7th sub-density of 3rd density?