11-05-2012, 10:44 PM
(11-05-2012, 08:29 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Quote:...The, shall we say, saga of polarity, its consequences and limits, were unimagined until experienced.
Since these early Logoi chose to evolve without free will, they (and their sub-logoi) all evolved on the positive path. It wasn't until a Logos chose to evolve with free will that the negative path became actualized. Prior to this, it still existed in potentiality.
Therefore, it had been perceived, but not yet experienced.
To me "unimagined until experienced" means that it was not perceived before the first experience happened.
(11-05-2012, 08:29 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Quote:77.21 Questioner: Then did this particular Logos that we experience plan for this polarity and know all about it prior to its plan? I suspect that this is what happened.
Ra: I am Ra. This is quite correct.
Don says that our Logos knew all about polarity prior to its plan. Ra says this is quite correct.
Yes, this is very interesting. So we could say that our current experience has been setup with the saga of polarity in mind.

(11-05-2012, 08:29 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:Quote:77.22 Questioner: In that case, as a Logos, you would have an advantage of selecting the form of acceleration, you might say, of spiritual evolution by planning what we call the major archetypical philosophical foundations and planning these as a function of the polarity that would be gained in third density. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is exquisitely correct.
The Logos chose to use polarity as a means of evolution. Ra says this is exquisitely correct.
This is not to say that the Logos manifested the positive and negative paths of polarization, and then secretly "crossed their fingers" that sub-logoi would take one, and not the other.
Quite to the contrary, if none of the sub-logoi were to choose the negative path, then what would be the point? What would be the point of the negative path, if no entities were to experience it?
Also- Do you realize that an entity could polarize on the negative path, and not play the role of a "bad guy"? They could play the role of a "benevolent despot" for example.
Like Ra said, the potential between positive and negative is what gives opportunity for greater work. Like it is for electricity. Also, those choosing the negative path are a part of our Logos, or sub-Logos in some cases. They are certainly not our enemies, they are fellow other-selves.
Humans are not all from the same sub-Logos and so are not all built using the same archetypes. It gives an even more extreme playground for experiences.