11-17-2012, 12:56 PM
Ok, so I have to look something up myself that you are citing multiple times as your opinion? I think you may be referring to this 'interview'?
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/10/keshe...s-special/
Its not an actual interview. I would say its a small fraction(less than 25%) of Geoffrey's audio from the actual interview and the rest is Geoffrey dubbing his own commentary all over the interview because he didn't like the result of it. I have no frame of reference for the question asked since he dubs his own commentary/question over what was actually asked. For all we know, he could have asked a poorly worded, unclear question before hand which elicited the resulting answer from Keshe. He is interviewing a scientist and applying his new-age-hipster (sassy) attitude to everything and giving no consideration to where Keshe is coming from. Keshe even attempts to meet Geoffry half-way near the end of the interview and gives a concession that he knows there is corruption in the governments even though he stated earlier in interview that he doesn't want to get tangled up in politics; he is a scientist.
In my opinion, Geoffry went in to the interview expecting a new-ager (even though Keshe is a scientist) and proceeded to bash him in hindsight(which is always 20-20) with dubbed criticism.
Oceania, if you weren't making a claim, why did you regurgitate his opinion of Keshe in two separate threads about him? The problem with regurgitating someone else's opinion while not forming an opinion of it yourself is you aren't actually thinking for yourself. For example, I could carpet every Ron Paul thread here on the forums with something like "Fox News says Ron Paul will never get elected because he's not realistic!", then when challenged on this claim could defensively say "I'm only telling you what Fox said!". It is impossible to form a fair opinion of Keshe from that 'interview' since its 75% opinion and commentary and 25% actual interview. You would need to watch an interview that is not dubbed with criticism on top of entering the interview with any opinion of Keshe, positive or negative in order to form an unbiased opinion of him.
I'm not sure why you think I am trying to 'fight you'. I was merely responding to your scathing, regurgitated opinion of Keshe from these posts:
If you don't want anyone to come up with a counter-argument, then maybe you shouldn't trash someone with no evidence to back up your claims. I already asked for supporting evidence once and you ignored me:
http://the2012scenario.com/2012/10/keshe...s-special/
Its not an actual interview. I would say its a small fraction(less than 25%) of Geoffrey's audio from the actual interview and the rest is Geoffrey dubbing his own commentary all over the interview because he didn't like the result of it. I have no frame of reference for the question asked since he dubs his own commentary/question over what was actually asked. For all we know, he could have asked a poorly worded, unclear question before hand which elicited the resulting answer from Keshe. He is interviewing a scientist and applying his new-age-hipster (sassy) attitude to everything and giving no consideration to where Keshe is coming from. Keshe even attempts to meet Geoffry half-way near the end of the interview and gives a concession that he knows there is corruption in the governments even though he stated earlier in interview that he doesn't want to get tangled up in politics; he is a scientist.
In my opinion, Geoffry went in to the interview expecting a new-ager (even though Keshe is a scientist) and proceeded to bash him in hindsight(which is always 20-20) with dubbed criticism.
Oceania, if you weren't making a claim, why did you regurgitate his opinion of Keshe in two separate threads about him? The problem with regurgitating someone else's opinion while not forming an opinion of it yourself is you aren't actually thinking for yourself. For example, I could carpet every Ron Paul thread here on the forums with something like "Fox News says Ron Paul will never get elected because he's not realistic!", then when challenged on this claim could defensively say "I'm only telling you what Fox said!". It is impossible to form a fair opinion of Keshe from that 'interview' since its 75% opinion and commentary and 25% actual interview. You would need to watch an interview that is not dubbed with criticism on top of entering the interview with any opinion of Keshe, positive or negative in order to form an unbiased opinion of him.
(11-17-2012, 05:59 AM)Oceania Wrote: you wanna start a fight with me huh? i'll meet you outside.
I'm not sure why you think I am trying to 'fight you'. I was merely responding to your scathing, regurgitated opinion of Keshe from these posts:
(11-16-2012, 09:08 AM)Oceania Wrote: Geoffrey West interviewed this guy and said he was pretty much a dipshit eeyore. but since he's a lightspreader he used prettier words.
(10-24-2012, 04:19 AM)Oceania Wrote: Geoffrey said mr Keshe was a douche to him and stuff.
If you don't want anyone to come up with a counter-argument, then maybe you shouldn't trash someone with no evidence to back up your claims. I already asked for supporting evidence once and you ignored me:
(10-24-2012, 10:08 AM)Parsons Wrote:(10-24-2012, 04:19 AM)Oceania Wrote: Geoffrey said mr Keshe was a douche to him and stuff.
And so after carefully considering Keshe's interview candor by watching one of his interviews, you agreed with the opinion of this 'Geoffry'?