Humanity should respect animals.

[Tenet Nosce]

The above quote seems to suggest that space itself is the actual 'akashic record' storage of all thought and experience of The One, which Ra also designated as the plenum. This would suggest that plenum did not exist before original thought process and is rather a process of it, just as we are, which would also seem to support the new dark matter theories.

The above quote also makes the designation of the fragments as 'portions of the Creator', which partake less purely in full power. Also stating that The Creator does not create as much as it experiences, and that the portions are in a graduating process, less endowed, for the purpose of refining, which may/might enable The One to come to know Itself. Suggesting that The Creator does not yet know Itself, and also suggesting that the portions are in an even lesser state of being able to accomplish that as well. It states that each generation of the fragment/portion develops a capacity to know itself, but it is a gradual process that may/might enable The Creator to know itself at some further point of that process.

I would surely like to have a more elaborate explanation of that considering its meaning with regard to those who suggest that the Creator already knows itself and that creation is complete already and finished; that All is done in such a way that higher understanding can actually know the future because it is already completed. This quote seems to deny and contradict that sort of thinking.

I think the general gist is that there is an in- and out-breath to Creation. At the end of every cycle there is the calling back and distillation of experience, from which the Creator comes to know itself more fully. And then the cycle repeats.

I'm not sure where any are asserting that creation is already complete and finished. But if this argument is supposedly based in the Ra Material, I find little basis for it.

Finally is it possible for anyone to point me to any information relating to these specifics in the 'Brown Notes'?

The Origins of L/L Research