Humanity should respect animals.

[Tenet Nosce]

Huh? But wait, I thought you said I was only a lowly 4D Wanderer??

Right. So let's leave "you" out of the equation for now.

Imagine the seven densities. Each with seven sub-densities. And each sub-density with seven sub-sub densities. Going on ad infinitum, as a hologram. Now imagine these all spiraling into each other.

It is possible to move in a spiral from lesson to lesson, or even density to density, with having a considerable amount of work left to yet on the previous track. However, in order to progress beyond a certain level of completion in any one track, a progressively higher degree of development is necessary in all the others.

In other words, we can envision two theoretical wanderers.

Wanderer A is working on very late 4D lessons of compassion. This of necessity would involve a high level of previous work done with wisdom, love, and faith. When Wanderer A graduates to 5D, and on to 6D, they are likely to have a great ease of experience, because they wisely anticipated the work of the next two densities.

Wanderer B is working on very early 6D lessons of blending, having done the minimum amount of work on previous lessons to graduate from 4D and 5D. This wanderer foolishly arrives at 6D to be flung into an impenetrable wall of light. It then realizes that it cannot pass even the most basic lessons of 6D without going back and completing the rest of their lessons on compassion.

Who is the "higher" of the two wanderers? The answer is: Dumb question. It isn't a linear progression.

The only difference between Wanderers A and B is in their particular strategy for awakening. One isn't better than the other; they're just two different paths. Two "Bozos on the Bus."

I'll ask you this- if an early 4D civilization made contact with humanity... would you say we should just blindly trust everything they tell us about "ethics and activity" as the end-all-be-all truth simply because they have attained 4D?

Wait! Not so fast! You might be right, but that is an assumption. Correlation doesn't necessarily equal causation.

All I have assumed is free will. If you believe that children are being given programming by their parents that they didn't previously agree to pre-incarnatively, that would require its own consideration.

That doesn't sound right to me.

The alternative would be to conclude that most of us who think we are wanderers are actually 3D natives, and are deluding ourselves about our "high and mighty" wanderer status. If feeling compassion for animals to the point of not eating them were an early 4D lesson- if it were so basic- then all wanderers from all densities would have already been done working on it. Therefore, we might be led to conclude that anybody who eats meat could not possibly be a wanderer.