(12-06-2012, 05:24 AM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: Monica, in my personal opinion, I don't think Cyan violated any guidelines with that post.
What he said was:
Cyan Wrote:In my view, the best examples of Lucifer energies, as i perceive them here are Zen, Me, Shin'ar, Monica, off the top of my head.
Regardless of how tactful it may or may not be to attempt to communicate one's subjective perceptions of the spiritual identities of other members... (remember we are behind the veil!)
There is nothing inherently disrespectful to what Cyan said, in my opinion (not speaking for the whole moderator team). Lucifer is just an identity. How one reacts to another's subjective perception of other-self as that identity depends on the biases one holds towards that identity. Of course it's true that Lucifer is negatively polarized (before the mid 6th density point), it's far different than name calling - calling someone STS for example.
It also depends on Cyan's intentions. Because he said "In my view", this leads me to believe he's sharing his subjective perception, rather than labeling another member which would be name calling. One could switch out the identity he mentioned for any other identity, and the reactions received would be across the spectrum (as they could be for even the one identity).
By "that post" I assume you're referring to the Luciferian post. (I referenced 2 incidents, not just 1.)
Even if my name wasn't on that list, I would consider labeling any of our members "the heartless inquisitive scientists who's heart is in the result that lies beyond this life" most definitely in the category disrespectful.
Here's a math lesson:
If a=b and b=c, then a=c.
If Lucifer=STS and Z, S and M = Lucifer, then Z, S and M = STS.
So yes, those individuals were labeled STS.
Well I'm glad to hear you aren't speaking for the mods here Aaron.