(12-07-2012, 03:48 PM)Tenet Nosce Wrote:(12-05-2012, 01:26 AM)Brittany Lynn Wrote: Formerly "Send Love to Lucifer"...I changed the title of this thread since some confusion seems to have arisen regarding the use of that name.
There is no confusion in light of this quote:
85.7 Wrote:If one wishes to have power over an entity it is an aid to know that entity’s name. If one wishes no power over an entity but wishes to collect that entity into the very heart of one’s own being it is well to forget the naming. Both processes are magically viable. Each is polarized in a specific way. It is your choice.
Therefore, sending "love energy" to named negative entities is actually an attempt to have power/control over those entities.
Furthermore, this was a violation of the guidelines:
Bring4th Guidelines Wrote:4) Philosophies and information which exhibit elements of deception, manipulative thinking, generate fear, reject or discourage universal love, and encourage or promote control of self or others – are considered to be not in alignment with the principles of spiritual evolution espoused by Confederation sources and are thus subject to moderation and/or removal.
Looks to me like the confusion was in your own mind- and in the minds of those who immediately jumped on the bandwagon- rather than those who- in compassion for those being misled to seek power over negative entities- questioned the wisdom of such an endeavor.
(12-06-2012, 07:42 PM)Brittany Lynn Wrote: I plan on specifically doing the "Lucifer meditation" every day at least until the solstice, but if anyone would like to add other foci, I'd be open to that as well. So long as I don't get too much on my plate and short myself out.
So then, it is still a "Lucifer meditation"? Or at least... as of 8:42 pm yesterday?
You are extremely ironically doing the same thing this guideline is set I place for. You don't like, don't agree with, and/or don't understand the purpose of the meditation and seek to control us by attempting to stop this meditation. This thread is already four pages long and judging by skimming the last few posts I would venture a guess it has turned into arguing.
I thought we agreed to disagree on this days ago?