12/21/2012: David Wilcock, Harvest, Ra, New Age Gurus. What does it all mean?

[Steppingfeet]

The more interesting, and relevant, question in my mind is to elucidate the tenuous link between David Wilcock's concept of "ascension" and what was actually said in the Ra material. There seems to be a big question mark as to how this link was made, and why it was never openly refuted by L/L Research.

Analyzing and discussing the merits of any conclusion drawn from the pages of the Law of One material is a worthwhile discussion. As the Bring4th Forums testify, a multiplicity of conclusions may be drawn from a single sentence, much less from various pieces of data mined throughout and synthesized from the series.

How well or not well DW drew upon the Law of One to support his suppositions in the article, “Law of One and 2012: The Facts!”, and whether the Law of One books actually support his position, is a great conversation to have. And as Aaron indicated, there is a place for that.

As to L/L Research openly refuting his position, is there precedent for this? Does L/L Research publicly refute or repudiate the positions of others? Especially in light of the fact that there are a plurality of interpretations that may be brought to bear on the material?

To claim objective, authoritative, infallible interpretation regarding what the material says is, in my opinion, a step away from supporting that radical notion that the seeker is his or her own authority. To do so would be to make the same error that "Law of One and 2012: The Facts!" made: to present ones interpretation as being absolute, as being the interpretation. Given its role in producing the Confederation material combined with its experience in this particular field, L/L Research has certainly gained in wisdom and may indeed be a helpful source for guidance regarding the material, but L/L Research is not an arbiter of that which the material says vs that which it doesn't. (Which doesn’t of course preclude L/L from offering its opinion nevertheless if it so chooses.)

Of course some items are black and white. Ra said that third density comes before fourth density in the chronological sequence. But theories regarding how the transition to fourth density will unfold are open to a spectrum of interpretation, especially in light of the incomplete and puzzling information bequeathed to us by those of Ra.

That we all could go "poof" when that "discrete boundary" is crossed still holds water. As does the theory that we will live out our natural lives and meet natural, by the standards of this density, ends. In my opinion, Ra didn't settle this one definitively. Consequently I think it unlikely that any of us will fare better in nailing it down to one scenario or the other.

Which is why I always suggest to the inquiring seeker that, while interesting, questions regarding what precisely will happen on Dec 21, or with respect to the transition, can be distracting. Within the present moment are our opportunities for service, and our experience of who we are. : )

Much love, GLB