(01-02-2013, 01:41 PM)ShinAr Wrote:(01-01-2013, 03:55 PM)Bring4th_Aaron Wrote: I'm not trying to teach...
Worry less about the phony taboo of teaching, and focus more on just sharing what you have to offer.
Let those who have a problem with that deal with it themselves.
Teach/learn is the same as learn/teach.
It is known more universally as sharing, which is the sacred core of Divine Design.
Teaching must be balanced with learning, otherwise one is closed to what may be received from others and it's an imbalanced action. I understand Ra's term teach/learn to mean that in each instance that one is teaching, one is also learning. They are the same action because one cannot come without the other.
What I meant by "I'm not trying to teach" is more like "I'm not trying to speak with unquestionable authority on the subject" - not trying to put myself in the role of a teacher or preacher who is not open to input from others, who is not attempting to be of service from the heart by humbly sharing their experience.
(01-02-2013, 03:58 PM)Bring4th_Monica Wrote:(01-02-2013, 01:41 PM)ShinAr Wrote: Teach/learn is the same as learn/teach.
By that logic, then time/space is the same as space/time.
They are!

Time is the same as space. It's the same "substance", just distorted in two opposite ways. So space/time and time/space would be the way of describing the quality of either end of the spectrum.
There's this quote to consider:
Quote:41.20 Questioner: Could you tell me the difference between space/time and time/space?
Ra: I am Ra. Using your words, the difference is that between the visible and invisible or the physical and metaphysical. Using mathematical terms, as does the one you call Larson, the difference is that between s/t and t/s.
And there's actually a thread about it in Strictly Law of One right now:
http://bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=6363