(08-02-2013, 02:19 PM)Parsons Wrote: Isn't that literally the only reason anyone is healed?
66.10 Questioner: What is the difference, philosophically, between a mind/body/spirit complex healing itself through mental, shall I say, configuration or it being healed by an healer?
Ra: I am Ra. You have a misconception. The healer does not heal. The crystallized healer is a channel for intelligent energy which offers an opportunity to an entity that it might heal itself.
In no case is there an other description of healing. Therefore, there is no difference as long as the healer never approaches one whose request for aid has not come to it previously. This is also true of the more conventional healers of your culture and if these healers could but fully realize that they are responsible only for offering the opportunity of healing, and not for the healing, many of these entities would feel an enormous load of misconceived responsibility fall from them.
Allow me to clarify the point I am trying to make: Both positive and negative effects, including the development of any disease or healing thereof via a conventional OR nonconventional doctor OR by the self whether consciously(energy or 'magical' healing) or subconsciously(the placebo effect) is caused by the individual mind body spirit complex thought manifesting into physical reality.
Life is one big manifestation. My comment re: placebo effect was merely saying that it's not just contingent on thought but other physiological processes as well, which is not the type of manifestation as described in The Secret (which is what this thread is about if you read the OP article).