10-25-2013, 05:57 PM
(10-25-2013, 01:06 PM)peregrine Wrote: Hail, plenum!
It seems we agree, and I would let it go at that...but I have some additional queries.
Whereas I would not argue with what you present, I wonder if you would agree that it feels over balanced towards a masculine, mechanistic attitude and could be further enhanced if it also encompassed the more fluid, organic aspects of the experience of self as seemingly unrelated strands weave and curl through various levels, known and unknown, of one's being? Do you suppose that the kind of equipoise suggested is attained by merely following some rules? The stupefying complexity of being (or, the confusion in the hall of mirrors) may not lend itself to such a concise remedy.
I wonder if xise is suggesting a balance point of love (where is the love in this moment?) and your suggestion balances on a point of wisdom?
The point doesn't change only your perception of it. Would the two methods you allude to not coincide to the balancing of love/wisdom ?
There comes a point where both love and wisdom need each other to continue perceived progress.