The Dismantling of the Approval/Disapproval Mechanism

[zenmaster]

As Ra said, "The entity ruled by intuition and impulse is equal to the entity governed by rational analysis when polarity is considered."

If you rig the comparison that way, then, yes, that is what you will get. But the intention here is not to be ruled by one bias or another.

It's not "ruled by", it's mainly your bodily disposition which provides that initial bias until sufficiently explored and the imbalance is made sufficiently conscious.

If you follow that journey of 14 or so inches from your head to your heart, the ensuing state of consciousness is not comparable with the one left behind, or have I been mis-understanding Q'uo all this time?

There is no development that goes from head to heart. Qu'o is Carla's personal "guidance system" and most of that material is geared toward addressing her allegory, which does not extend much into the deeper mind.

These are not comparable in that the latter is grounded in the first distortion of free will. This is not wisdom. This is love.

"Love" is primarily acceptance. The "heart" is reached *upwards* not downwards. That is upwards from acceptance of self which is reflected in each energy center for balancing.

If there is wisdom-love imbalance than either faculty may be used to balance.

True, but again, consciousness resonates differently (more in accord with the Creator...twice removed, not thrice) when it is seated in the heart, no?

Yes "heart" as in "core" of being - that which is centered. The original face, where you originally came from, etc. That core is something that is constantly sought though. You aren't seated in that "heart".

feeling is from time/space and thinking is from space/time - so the view is a dichotomy. So one treatment is not "more mature" than another lol! The time/space (feeling) view is simply inherently holistic - however that wholeness is of course not conscious, merely on the periphery of consciousness - it is a suggestion to consciousness. The space/time view (thinking) identifies parts. 100% complementary processes. Those born with the feeling bias will eventually need to work on their thinking to achieve "maturity" and vice versa.

I read the discussion which your link leads to and it certainly is all about dichotomy. However, this other point is a different matter, in my view. I would say that Q'uo has very strong reasons for advocating that one make that 14 inch journey.

Again, Carla's allegory and an idea of a level of acceptance which is moving away from some ineffectual condition which she associates with "the head".

It's not that the landscape looks different from there, my colleague, but it vibrates very differently and, in my opinion, brings one closer to a state where the LOO holds sway and all paradoxes (and dichotomies) find peaceable resolution.

Not really. The paradoxes don't have a resolution here, by a long shot. When "green ray" is initially reached we may begin to explore interiors and have indeed enabled a connection to a more holistic view which may *suggest* resolution in infinity. The actual exploration of the suggestions and their ownership is quite another thing entirely.

It's beyond mere conceptualization; it's a more resonant reorganization of consciousness so that the abstracted self lies more in alignment with trans-personal being...unless I'm wrong...

"green ray" provides the first taste of "transpersonal being", and there is a reorganization of consciousness with that of course. But fundamentally, it's a level of vibration which is reached through a sufficient acceptance of self. If some confusion or distracting ideas were blocking that acceptance (and the associated welcoming of those energies), and that blockage is associated with the "head" then you have your 14" journey. But that's someone's specific personal allegory and not some general principle of evolution.