11-22-2013, 02:38 AM
Golly, my humble stoney analogy seems unable to bear up under the stream of weighty criticism, which is okay...<sniffle, sniffle, sniffle>.
I seem to be swimming against the current here--as it were. To me, the beauty of the suggestion to minimally charge and balance the initial chakras in order to more directly contact the heart and those beyond lies in the simplicity of the guidance, not in the complexity of the possibilities.
Speaking as one who has in the past reveled in the complexity, perhaps it takes a certain distance from all of that to appreciate the simplicity implicit in the message of the guidance?
If one could (following much balancing) simply hop from stone to stone in most experiences and quickly reach a place of "tabernacling with the Creator," wouldn't that trump endless time fondling of the complexity?
Well, one being thinks so...but what do I know? I don't even have enough posts on this site to be accredited as a bone fide wanderer. And so it is.
I seem to be swimming against the current here--as it were. To me, the beauty of the suggestion to minimally charge and balance the initial chakras in order to more directly contact the heart and those beyond lies in the simplicity of the guidance, not in the complexity of the possibilities.
Speaking as one who has in the past reveled in the complexity, perhaps it takes a certain distance from all of that to appreciate the simplicity implicit in the message of the guidance?
If one could (following much balancing) simply hop from stone to stone in most experiences and quickly reach a place of "tabernacling with the Creator," wouldn't that trump endless time fondling of the complexity?
Well, one being thinks so...but what do I know? I don't even have enough posts on this site to be accredited as a bone fide wanderer. And so it is.