It's interesting how the word belief is tied to this idea of thought structure..as if the structure is a thing which is real. Our interactions with others can either create harmony or disharmony. When one attempts to convey understanding, is it really understanding, or repetition of control? If thoughts are symbols, the use of our consciousness in a symbolic manner must make all the difference. The approach to catalyst seems to be the only thing that determines what makes a person positive or negative. I believe well intentioned teaching of positive philosophy when others do not seem to be asking for advice is not love of others, it's love of self. Because it's not about the philosophy you're conveying, it's about you and your wisdom. This must be what happened with Atantis, Maldek etc. It's the negative idea of "..those working from feelings of being correct personally or of having answers which will put power in a more correct configuration."
"The Law of One states simply that all things are one, that all beings are one. There are certain behaviors and thought-forms consonant with the understanding and practice of this law."
One thing I've found helpful is to simply reflect on whether you're creating/channeling joy or control. Rather than attempting to control a person's mind, it may be helpful to ask "What is this person asking of me? Are the opinions they're expressing just their confusion? And are they really asking for an answer? And if not, well that's ok! Why? Because I see myself. I also have/had those thoughts. So I'm not going to correct them. They're allowed to own their thoughts and be themselves."
If harmony is the goal, creating and exuding that joyful state of being must be fundamental. Beingness..be harmony, channel it. Bring harmony into being. If more and more of us are able to be happy with what is, then more and more harmony will begin to manifest. Create harmony. If I'm happy, and I let others believe what they want to believe (what we could call happiness since it's comfort), then there is no conflict between us two. People intuitively resonate with those who are happy people and understand that's what they seek. They'll ask for advice to questions when they're ready. Being there for when someone asks something from you is true service to others.
"The Law of One states simply that all things are one, that all beings are one. There are certain behaviors and thought-forms consonant with the understanding and practice of this law."
One thing I've found helpful is to simply reflect on whether you're creating/channeling joy or control. Rather than attempting to control a person's mind, it may be helpful to ask "What is this person asking of me? Are the opinions they're expressing just their confusion? And are they really asking for an answer? And if not, well that's ok! Why? Because I see myself. I also have/had those thoughts. So I'm not going to correct them. They're allowed to own their thoughts and be themselves."
If harmony is the goal, creating and exuding that joyful state of being must be fundamental. Beingness..be harmony, channel it. Bring harmony into being. If more and more of us are able to be happy with what is, then more and more harmony will begin to manifest. Create harmony. If I'm happy, and I let others believe what they want to believe (what we could call happiness since it's comfort), then there is no conflict between us two. People intuitively resonate with those who are happy people and understand that's what they seek. They'll ask for advice to questions when they're ready. Being there for when someone asks something from you is true service to others.
![[+]](https://www.bring4th.org/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png)