12-19-2013, 10:56 AM
(12-18-2013, 10:21 PM)Adonai One Wrote: Does the nature of societal control, laws and their enforcement lack polarity? Is "positive control of people" a genuine term?
There are general laws related to morality that seem relevant, such as don't kill, assault, steal, etc. In many cases of stealing, there are underlying issues however. Rather than sending a person to jail in such a case, there could be more compassionate solutions.
I was having a discussion with someone about the Common Core standards here in the US the other day. People are furious over it, saying the government has no business in changing such standards, and that it is an attempt to dumb America down. I choose not to believe the latter, but you can see that if society does not tend to its overall needs, who else will? So the government has to come in and attempt a solution and everyone gets pissed. You can see that people's free will choices, the separative lives we choose to live that creates imbalance on a societal level, leads to more distortion and unnecessary restriction.
83.14 Questioner: I would say that a very high percentage of the laws and restrictions within what we call our legal system are of a nature of enslavement of which I just spoke. Would you agree with this?
Ra: I am Ra. It is a necessary balance to the intention of law, which is to protect, that the result would encompass an equal distortion towards imprisonment. Therefore, we may say that your supposition is correct. This is not to denigrate those who, in green and blue-ray energies, sought to free a peaceable people from the bonds of chaos but only to point out the inevitable consequences of codification of response which does not recognize the uniqueness of each and every situation within your experience.