Having just finished the Ra material, I looked around this website and found this promising forum thread on Larson.
RS theory was going to be one of my future projects.
At the moment I am trying to read "Secrets of the Aether", but it is a little too mathematical for my taste/abilities. The basic ideas behind the Aether Physics Model are (to me) similar to Larson's.
The measured speed of stars in galactic arms did not match the calculations based on gravitational theory.
The chosen solution was to arbitrarily add invisible matter to make the observations fit the theory. Another solution would have been to question the validity of the theory. This second solution will probably prove to be more worthwhile for understanding the universe.
gerards regards
RS theory was going to be one of my future projects.
At the moment I am trying to read "Secrets of the Aether", but it is a little too mathematical for my taste/abilities. The basic ideas behind the Aether Physics Model are (to me) similar to Larson's.
(02-13-2009, 04:26 PM)Phoenix Wrote: The reason I posted was because of this article.Phoenix, the existence of dark matter and dark energy was proposed to solve problems with astronomical observations.
http://www.mindpowernews.com/FiveMysteries.htm
If anyone wants to read it. Five mysteries science can't explain. I can answer the end one efficiently to do with free will and brain chemistry. Which was answered in Michael Talbot's book. Holographic Universe.
I thought of it because until just now I couldn't explain number one.
The measured speed of stars in galactic arms did not match the calculations based on gravitational theory.
The chosen solution was to arbitrarily add invisible matter to make the observations fit the theory. Another solution would have been to question the validity of the theory. This second solution will probably prove to be more worthwhile for understanding the universe.
gerards regards