The Great Way and the Tao

[JustLikeYou]

Can we use the term of one or oneness as the term that represents the truest nature of all things? This concept complex is in our view, the writers, the representation of the entire archetypal tree of the mind as it represents its truest nature and inevitable attainment. Is this well?

It is quite well for you, but unfortunately it is not what I have in mind. I am trying to distinguish between oneness itself and the concept of oneness. The first is ontological and the second is conceptual. Oneness itself is not a representation of anything; rather, everything is a representation of it. Neither oneness itself nor the concept of oneness give any information whatsoever about the archetypal mind because the concept of oneness is a simple concept--necessarily so. To suggest otherwise is to strip traditional content from the very word "oneness".

In terms of attainment of oneness, the archetypal mind only describes the pathways of movement in third density toward that ultimate unity, the attainment of which lies well beyond the experience of third density. Within the archetypal mind the concept of oneness is found many times over, just as within a strand of DNA the element of carbon is found many times over, but there is no concept complex for oneness just as there is no amino acid for carbon. Oneness itself (and not merely the concept), however, contains all things, including the 3D archetypal mind.

I feel I have merely restated what I said in my previous post, but that it was also necessary. Is my perspective reasonably clear to you?