Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will

As of Friday, August 5th, 2022, the Bring4th forums on this page have been converted to a permanent read-only archive. If you would like to continue your journey with Bring4th, the new forums are now at https://discourse.bring4th.org.

You are invited to enjoy many years worth of forum messages brought forth by our community of seekers. The site search feature remains available to discover topics of interest. (July 22, 2022) x

Thread: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will

LsavedSmeD (Offline)

Member

Posts: 246
Threads: 19
Joined: Oct 2009

06-04-2010, 03:09 AM

(06-04-2010, 01:17 AM)Rama Wrote: ok. but this not fully answered [indeed it reflects back on the question, but let us proceed]

what is being violated when you have the 'right to know' & the 'right not to know' [as equivalences]?

why is a bias set? and what are its prerequisites granting it this status?

Lets say it is your right to know as well as your right not to know.

Your right to know and not to know are balanced by each other until you ask a question.

« Next Oldest | Next Newest »

Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)

Messages In This Thread

Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Rama - 06-04-2010, 12:09 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by LsavedSmeD - 06-04-2010, 12:39 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Rama - 06-04-2010, 01:17 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Turtle - 06-04-2010, 01:30 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by LsavedSmeD - 06-04-2010, 03:09 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Rama - 06-04-2010, 01:50 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Cyclops - 06-04-2010, 08:23 PM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Rama - 06-05-2010, 10:28 AM

RE: Violating The Law of Confusion/Free-Will - by Phoenix - 06-05-2010, 09:19 PM

Login

Username:
Password:

Login

Username:
Password: