05-14-2014, 08:20 PM
(This post was last modified: 05-14-2014, 08:23 PM by Adonai One.)
I think the terminology of rays is so currently subjective, that it is utterly useless for conversation, as the semantics of these rays are not even universally agreed upon and their foundation within the archetypal mind is kept so utterly mystical with no consensus whatsoever.
There is no discussion with the current language we have. There is simply a restatement of beliefs of what the terms mean with only an inference that Ra has connoted such a position. We have no clear foundation and we depend on a convicted faith that our positions are directly coherent with the Ra Material. We rely on this book as an authority and we cannot find the heart within ourselves to actually justify our beliefs by our own self-knowledge.
There is no discussion with the current language we have. There is simply a restatement of beliefs of what the terms mean with only an inference that Ra has connoted such a position. We have no clear foundation and we depend on a convicted faith that our positions are directly coherent with the Ra Material. We rely on this book as an authority and we cannot find the heart within ourselves to actually justify our beliefs by our own self-knowledge.