The Bring4th Treatise on Service-to-Others Ethics

[Fang]

I will let one thing be known cos I think I may have been taken the wrong way somewhere along the line.

When I say "x is orange ray regression" and back it up with quotes from the Ra Material it doesn't mean I think you are neglecting your duty to the positive polarity, it's that there is a misunderstanding of the implications of one's own beliefs. I don't believe in the Ra Material like you guys, it's a text for me to study, a statement about something in the Ra Material from me will be in the context of the material in mind, rather than my own spin on it. I don't think there is a "positive polarity" (in the way you guys see it) but when people say they want to polarize positively and then bring up a lot of points that, when viewed in the context of the Ra Material would be contradictory to their goals ie. reversion to orange ray, avoidance of catalyst etc. I will point it out.

People have picked up the STO/STS concept and ran with it, resulting in all sorts of ridiculous self affirming free association, tbh I find most of the polarity talk on this website to be drivel.

My ethics are my own and my posts would not be a reflection of my views which I won't share here, a decision I hope you can respect.