06-28-2014, 01:14 PM
nio pondered ...
the followup paragraph to this is also elucidating:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=67#26
* "Two services offered, mutually rejected"
* "each allowed to go upon its own path of experiencing the One Infinite Creator."
so even though one might send a neggie 'love and light', it was not requested, even though it is an offering of an opportunity to the other.
And likewise, what a neggie entity usually offers one is also not requested, but is likewise an opportunity.
- -
I like Tanner's idea of sympathetic vibration there is regards to 'love' and 'light'.
Ra Wrote:There is great humor in your attempt to be of polarized service to the opposite polarity.
There is a natural difficulty in doing so since what you consider service is considered by this entity non-service. As you send this entity love and light and wish it well it loses its polarity and needs to regroup.
the followup paragraph to this is also elucidating:
http://www.lawofone.info/results.php?s=67#26
Ra Wrote:Thus it would not consider your service as such. On the other hand, if you allowed it to be of service by removing this instrument from your midst you might perhaps perceive this as not being of service.
You have here a balanced and polarized view of the Creator; two services offered, mutually rejected, and in a state of equilibrium in which free will is preserved and each allowed to go upon its own path of experiencing the One Infinite Creator.
* "Two services offered, mutually rejected"
* "each allowed to go upon its own path of experiencing the One Infinite Creator."
so even though one might send a neggie 'love and light', it was not requested, even though it is an offering of an opportunity to the other.
And likewise, what a neggie entity usually offers one is also not requested, but is likewise an opportunity.
- -
I like Tanner's idea of sympathetic vibration there is regards to 'love' and 'light'.