07-23-2014, 12:32 AM
(07-23-2014, 12:26 AM)Adonai One Wrote: Ra never speaks on the transcendence of a "little I" or "the human ego". We can discuss theory outside the context of the material but at that point we're just working with thin air.
Actually they do.
What do you think a social memory complex is?
Quote:17.13 ↥ Questioner: When I am communicating with you as Ra, are you at times [an] individualized entity or am I speaking to the entire complex?
Ra: I am Ra. You speak with Ra. There is no separation. You would call it a social memory complex thus indicating many-ness. To our understanding, you are speaking to an individualized portion of consciousness."
So Ra's self is no longer an "little I" but the social memory complex "I".