Session 017

[anagogy]

17.13
QUESTIONER: When I am communicating with you as Ra, are you at times [an] individualized entity or am I speaking to the entire complex?

RA: I am Ra. You speak with Ra. There is no separation. You would call it a social memory complex thus indicating many-ness. To our understanding, you are speaking to an individualized portion of consciousness.

Anyone have a good interpretation of what Ra says here? I don't quite understand. Don asked an either/or question, whether he was speaking to the entire complex or and individual entity, and Ra kind of says both.

I understand the idea that, even if it were an individual entity (or number of entities) of Ra working with the channeling sessions, they would be speaking from the collective mind of Ra.

My curiosity is what I think Don was intending to ask: is every single entity within the Ra social memory complex involved in channeling information to Carla, or is it an individual or individuals drawing from the social memory? My personal understanding of channeling is that a single entity within a social memory complex may take on the task of doing the channeling as the others may perform other tasks or not have to be involved with the channeling, and they all can draw upon the social mind in whatever they do and essentially share a mind - so the Ra material comes from the whole complex, not just one. But I can't make complete sense of Ra's answer here either way.

To my understanding, they are saying that the whole social memory complex of Ra is no longer a group of individuals working in fastidious harmony, but rather, they have literally become one being: Ra.

However, being a multidimensional sixth density being, Ra can be doing many many many things at once, and you are absolutely right, not "all" of Ra's consciousness is required for the channeling to occur. But with such a being, I don't believe it would be correct to think of it as one being acting as communicator while the rest of the beings are engaged in whatever work Ra engages in while not communicating. Rather, I think it is more accurate to think in terms of what percentage of the Ra social memory complex is focused on the working. Each portion is, in holographic style, the whole memory complex. So one might even do well to think of it in terms of strength of signal. The less Ra is focused on a given working, the less strength of signal is being expressed.