09-13-2014, 03:38 PM
Is this another chicken and egg debate?
Further on in this session...
The statement "discerned a concept" is indeed paradoxical because of the past tense implication of the word "discerned".
So it seems that in order for "spirit" to know itself, it's "material" expression, infinitely explores, through finite form, in order for its infinite essence to experience the gratification of its original intent.
Oral communication sucks eh?
(((
)))
Quote:13.5 Questioner: Thank you. Can you tell me of the earliest, first known thing in the creation?
Ra: I am Ra. The first known thing in the creation is infinity. The infinity is creation.
Further on in this session...
Quote:13.12 Questioner: Could you tell me how intelligent infinity became, shall we say (I’m having difficulty with some of the language), how intelligent infinity became individualized from itself?
Ra: I am Ra. This is an appropriate question.
The intelligent infinity discerned a concept. This concept was discerned due to freedom of will of awareness. This concept was finity. This was the first and primal paradox or distortion of the Law of One. Thus the one intelligent infinity invested itself in an exploration of many-ness. Due to the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity there is no ending to many-ness. The exploration, thus, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present.
The statement "discerned a concept" is indeed paradoxical because of the past tense implication of the word "discerned".
So it seems that in order for "spirit" to know itself, it's "material" expression, infinitely explores, through finite form, in order for its infinite essence to experience the gratification of its original intent.
Oral communication sucks eh?
(((
