Do you guys actually believe this stuff?

[βαθμιαίος]

But what I'm not sure you understand, which is surprising since you look up to Newton, is that science is inherently empirical and that we address what we can be repeatedly observed under the same conditions. The claims in this material are unobservable (unless you want every paranoid schizophrenic's anecdotal evidence constituting as a foundation for a robust model of reality), thus have no place in a scientific framework.

Don Elkins viewed the channeling sessions themselves as an experiment and for him and his group they were indeed reproducible. 106 times Carla went into a trance and gave information and philosophy that she had no knowledge of in her waking life, and the information was consistent across sessions.