10-02-2014, 08:10 PM
(This post was last modified: 10-02-2014, 08:19 PM by third-density-being.)
(10-02-2014, 04:18 AM)Unbound Wrote: 100% STS
100% STO
Doesn't that mean that You haven't made a choice? I'm sorry for permitting my-Self for such divagations, but this Idea fascinates me. Based on what You've wrote in "Unbound Thread", in some sense You're from beyond this Octave. I'm wondering if involving your-Self in this Octave "experiential polarization" might be your "Goal" all along in this incarnation? Or maybe opposite - to avoid polarization and experience this reality in detachment from "mainstream flow of energy"?
To thread itself - Thanks Isis for bringing it up. I think its giving us chance for deeper look at Our-Selves - to see how We are perceiving/evaluating each path.
From Our point of view there are strong duality, due to which We are assigning "moral values" of "good" and "evil" almost to anything. (even suff We believe makes us ill, are considered by Us as "evil" on/at symbolical level, etc.).
I really liked perspective given by Ra. For Him/Them both paths are to be embraced. They are equal to Ra, as they both leads in the same "direction" - into Oneness. For Ra "worst case scenario" is lack of a Choice. If One would not to lean to any "side" and become cumulating polarization, such Being would be repeating incarnational Mater Cycle in the density of a Choice.
As I am bound by third density "properties", I do perceive harming Others as "bad"/"evil" and helping/aiding/supporting Others as "good"/""dignified"/"saint-ish". But for Ra, Being that pursues Love to Self is on as good path, as One journeying Love to Other-Selves plane of experience. He/They is/are beyond polarization at this point and He/They understand both paths. Each deserve equal attention and admiration. To deny value of Service to Self polarization, is to deny meaning of Service to Others path.
Therefore I don't thing it is proper to "mythologize" too intensely any of the paths, and to clothe them with Our good/evil notions. Instead One should look at them from certain perspective.
What Ra said was not a "judgment tool" of Our incarnations, but a guideposts. For both Creator Loving Self within Self and for Creator Loving Self within Other-Selves.
In each case it is Creator Loving Creator.
It is my understanding, that One should not try to "fit in"/conform to/with this division. They are not "definitions of Beings" nor "evaluating tools". They are rather an explanations of Self for both paths Travelers.
Once I did not understood saying "Be your Self". Now it means for me that it is paramount to be in utmost accordance with what is within Us, and to observe and learn your-Self (and from wider perspective - Creator Him&Her-Self). Not to ignore even most minute aspect of Self. Each has its own meaning within Our Being-ness.
To appreciate each "moment" and through deep honesty to accept direction, in which it leads Us, while not being afraid of neither path.
In any case those are my thoughts about this issue
