Ra's Statements About 2D Entities

[Lighthead]

My guess is that it would actually accelerate their evolutionary rate, because of the intensity of the trauma. But, in the direction of STS.

The reason I conclude this is what we know about severe abuse of human children causing a predisposition towards being a sociopath. It stands to reason that the same might be true of our younger other-selves. The video posted in the OP, and the article posted by Diana (both linked here in this thread) both show that the mechanism for feeling intense emotions is the same in animals as in humans.

Thus, it stands to reason that their response would be the same.

On the other hand, we are also seeing an increase in animals showing compassion and 'human-like' forethought and consideration towards other animals, even across the divide of species, something hitherto unobserved. So, apparently, some of these animals are beginning their polarization to STO, and that appears to be accelerating rapidly...so rapidly that it's astonishing!

But those cases are few and far between. I've seen perhaps a dozen of such videos. Surely there are many more that haven't been caught on camera, but compared to the many billions of entities being traumatized, the number being observed as having accelerated STO polarity is miniscule indeed.

As with humans, it's likely that polarization can happen in either direction, in response to extreme trauma. We all know of cases of humans who were severely abused, yet turned into beautiful, compassionate people, rather than sociopaths. But scientific research has shown that the likelihood of that happening is very small, under certain circumstances having to do with whether they had any opportunity to bond with another human by a certain age. Surely, some humans override that, due to their free will and the invincibility of the human spirit. But even so, the end result is that the likelihood of severely abused children, who never had an opportunity for healing by a certain age, to become sociopaths is extremely high.

(Please note that one can be a sociopath and never commit any crimes. Sociopath doesn't necessarily mean psychopath. But it does indicate an armored, blocked heart, and a strong leaning in the direction of STS. A sociopath is defined by their lack of conscience, lack of empathy; ie., a closed heart.) It logically follows that the extreme cruelty towards our younger other-selves is, likewise, creating a huge population of strongly STS-biased entities...somewhere.

So, where are all those billions of traumatized, likely sociopathic, STS entities going when they graduate to 3D?

What you said is interesting, but I think that it may be a little different from what Ra has stated. Check it out:

19.15 Questioner: Then the newest third-density beings who’ve just made the transition from second are still strongly biased towards self-service. There must be many other mechanisms to create an awareness of the possibility of service to others.


I am wondering, first— two things. I’m wondering about the mechanism and I am wondering when the split takes place where the entity is able to continue on the road towards service to self that will eventually take him to fourth or fifth density.

I would assume that an entity can continue— can start, say, in second density with service totally to self and continue right on through and just stay on what we would call the path of service to self and never ever be pulled over. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. The second-density concept of serving self includes the serving of those associated with tribe or pack. This is not seen in second density as separation of self and other-self. All is seen as self since in some forms of second-density entities, if the tribe or pack becomes weakened, so does the entity within the tribe or pack.

The new or initial third-density entity has this innocent, shall we say, bias or distortion towards viewing those in the family, the society, as you would call, perhaps, country, as self. Thus though a distortion not helpful for progress in third density, it is without polarity.

The break becomes apparent when the entity perceives other-selves as other-selves and consciously determines to manipulate other-selves for the benefit of the self. This is the beginning of the road of which you speak.

Now the only thing that I can think about is that this channeled material was affected by a general bias that people had in the early 80s against having a true empathy towards animals. In other words, Ra may have wanted to say something that would have been perceived as "humanitarian" towards animals, but the general climate of thought at that time prevented it from coming out that way.

I suspect that this may be the case since Ra also makes a statement that can be perceived as viewing homosexuality as somewhat unnatural. Look here:

31.8 Questioner: We have what seems to be an increasing number of entities incarnate here now who have what is called a homosexual orientation in this respect. Could you explain and expand upon that concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Entities of this condition experience a great deal of distortion due to the fact that they have experienced many incarnations as biological male and as biological female. This would not suggest what you call homosexuality in an active phase were it not for the difficult vibratory condition of your planetary sphere. There is what you may call great aura infringement among your crowded urban areas in your more populous countries, as you call portions of your planetary surface. Under these conditions the confusions will occur.

I just want to make it clear that I'm not calling Carla a biased person. It's just that the society at that time very likely had an impact on the channeled material. I would also say that Ra most likely understood that there were certain things that were not perceived as appropriate at that time. Generally speaking.