04-12-2015, 11:00 PM
(04-12-2015, 10:52 PM)I_Am_The_One Wrote:(04-12-2015, 10:39 PM)seek Wrote:I for the most part agree. The only problem I have, is it seems a little clunky, and in general. It would be like saying all men are sto and need to learn this set standard of lessons, and primarily opposite for women. I think it is to broad.(04-12-2015, 10:13 PM)I_Am_The_One Wrote:(04-12-2015, 09:56 PM)seek Wrote: To me polarity is simply momentum. Building momentum in the desired direction.
1. Life presents a catalyst
1a. Experiential entity makes choice in desired direction and builds polarity
1b. Experiential entity makes choice in opposite direction and loses polarity
I believe the percentages explained by Ra (51% and 95%) are direct measures of polarity.
I would agree with what you are saying, to the scope it supplements. There are things seemingly controlled by polarity, that are beyond the scope of your definition of polarity. What in those numbers correlate to the polarity apparently apparent in your body. Such as female or male.
Allow me to clarify a bit.
At its base "polarity" is simply the presence of two opposing or contrasting principles. Gender being one system or idea of polarity. I would not say that these ideas are controlled by polarity but are polarity as in polar opposites.
A direct measure of polarity is a reflection of location on the sliding scale between polar opposites. The numbers I posted, as explained by Ra, are a direct measure of spiritual polarity on the sliding scale between positive and negative. I agree with you that the focus of my reply was within this context/scope.
With regard to gender, ones level of masculinity or femininity could be the direct measure of polarity on that sliding scale. Physical gender (as in sexual organs, brain chemistry, etc.) is a manifestation of the representation of that direct measurement decided by pre-incarnate distortions to facilitate the necessary learning desired for any particular lifetime. Gender can be a confusing example when discussing polarity because we seemingly start with a bias towards one side or the other. Though I have known some very feminine men and very masculine women. We also have many modern examples of "flipping" gender polarity mid-incarnation.
Cancel that. I reread it, making sure I got it. I would agree. I dont think polarity is just polar opposites though. Nor do I think all the "polarity" disconnected from one another, I believe polarity essentially starts near the top and is filtered down into rest of creation. I see it as the axis on which the whole creation turns. Everywhere you look, you find examples of polarity, of male and of female.Of negative and positive. I dont think it a good idea to begin separating this into concepts only containing one area of observation. All polarity is tied to another on different levels of creation.