Consideratons of s/t and t/s

[3D Sunset]

I read somewhere that our planet is actually negative, but I don't know how relevant or truthful that is.

I'm not sure what you mean by this. Clearly, we know that Earth will be a 4D positive planet when it is fully manifest into s/t (which it is not yet). At the present time, though I have seen no polarity associated with our 3D Earth, but I suspect that it is neutral.

I've heard no source telling that one could actually die in higher densities.

Ah contrair, my dear friend. By "die", I presume you mean the process whereby your s/t manifest body is placed into potentiation, and the indigo body is activated. Ra tells us that there are indeed different lives, or incarnations from t/s into s/t beyond 3D. Here's one example:

Ra, Book II, Session 43

Questioner: Can you state the average lifespan in the fourth density of space/time incarnation?

Ra: I am Ra. The space/time incarnation typical of harmonious fourth density is approximately 90,000 of your years as you measure time.

Questioner: Are there multiple incarnations in fourth density with time/space experiences in between incarnations?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Granted, "death" has a far different importance when living without the veil as in 4D and beyond. But clearly there are reasons to incarnate in order to proceed, even beyond 3D. (PM me for similar references for the other densities, if you're interested).

I always wondered if the displaced entity could simply go back to 3D and try again.

My real question has to do with what significance, if any, positive and negative t/s and s/t have on us in 3D. We know, for example, that entities must stay within their polarity when moving between s/t and t/s in the higher densities. This is why Carla might have become "trapped" in negative t/s the time she started to channel outside of a Ra session. I doubt that one must pass through 3D in order to change polarities, but it seems like it is one way to do so, as Phoenix indicates.

What, then, is an STS reality? (Contrasted with an STS consciousness.) A SMC? I'd always thought of the densities as being neutral, but their inhabitants having the polarity. ie. the consciousness, not the place of dwelling...but then, what is a place in time/space? What we think of as 'location' in space/time is totally different in time/space.

It seems fairly straightforward to understand what positive and negative s/t are, for we are already accustomed to the idea that Earth will be 4D Positive, and the harvestable 4D Negative entities will relocate to a suitable 4D Negative planet. I presume, by extension, that 4D positive and negative t/s are merely the t/s analogues to their s/t equivalent planets. What I find most interesting is the concept of "forced segregation" of s/t and t/s by polarities.

It could be that this is conceptually as simple as the polarized areas (s/t or t/s) acting opposite to that of magnets, (i.e., opposites repel, and likes attract). So it is not really t/s and s/t that are "negative" or "positive", but rather the area takes on the "magnetic field" (if you will) of the entities that reside there, and physics precludes their meeting.

By this definition, our 3D s/t and t/s would be probably net positive, and the relative low polarities associated with the entities would still allow interaction between different polarities in a fairly close fashion (think weak magnets). This might also explain why you rarely see strongly polarized opposing entities close together for very long.

Or maybe I'm just dreaming.

3D Sunset