05-11-2015, 06:18 PM
I really liked these questions from Hancock:
"Does the action that I am about to take transgress on the sovereignty of others? Does the action I am about to take add even one iota to the misery in the world, or does it reduce it?"
I am not a proponent of good/evil, right/wrong. Neither do I see myself in the karmic soup, helping others by providing catalyst. If I do, it is without intention, and I avoid involvement beyond listening. So from my point of view, though it is dubious why I am here, while I'm here I want to leave the least footprint of harm that I can. I don't see this as "good' or "right." It's just what I feel compelled to do and I conjecture it is because causing harm slows, debilitates, and hampers the perpetuation of life in its full potential. If an entity must suffer as part of a path in order to have negative experience, I don't see that as life in its full potential. I see that as a sidetrack to experience something ephemeral which may lead to certain realizations. I have yet to hear one channeled message where an alleged higher being is seeking negative and suffering experiences. That seems part of the duality here, as Hancock said, in learning to make choices, and aligns with what Ra said about 3D and free will. And the negative path, according to Ra, will only take an entity so far.
"Does the action that I am about to take transgress on the sovereignty of others? Does the action I am about to take add even one iota to the misery in the world, or does it reduce it?"
I am not a proponent of good/evil, right/wrong. Neither do I see myself in the karmic soup, helping others by providing catalyst. If I do, it is without intention, and I avoid involvement beyond listening. So from my point of view, though it is dubious why I am here, while I'm here I want to leave the least footprint of harm that I can. I don't see this as "good' or "right." It's just what I feel compelled to do and I conjecture it is because causing harm slows, debilitates, and hampers the perpetuation of life in its full potential. If an entity must suffer as part of a path in order to have negative experience, I don't see that as life in its full potential. I see that as a sidetrack to experience something ephemeral which may lead to certain realizations. I have yet to hear one channeled message where an alleged higher being is seeking negative and suffering experiences. That seems part of the duality here, as Hancock said, in learning to make choices, and aligns with what Ra said about 3D and free will. And the negative path, according to Ra, will only take an entity so far.