08-12-2010, 11:02 PM
(08-11-2010, 02:26 PM)Peregrinus Wrote: I would suggest that this does not make the negative entity ten times more powerful, only, on average, ten times more polarized.
I don't think negative entities are ten times more polarized. Ra says (19.17) that positively-polarized entities can switch to negative and vice-versa, and that it is equally difficult to attain a grade of 95% negative as 51% positive. I interpret that to mean that harvestable positive entities are equally as polarized as harvestable negative entities.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: you are in 3d as of this moment.
Very true. So when you asked about preventing enslavement, were you asking about preventing enslavement by third-density entities?
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: 'Their power is the same as ours.' and 'Law of One blinks to the neither side', means, there is balance.
It means there's a balance of opportunity for each side. It doesn't mean that a negative entity is ten times more powerful.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: the balance theory is not a theory, moreover its not mine. see above.
It's your theory that the negative entities are more powerful that seems to be inaccurate.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: if their power was the creator, than they would have the power to not only conquer this particular universe, but infinite number of universes.
No, because the positives have the same power and can stop them.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: similarly, if positives' power was the 'creator', same would happen positively.
No, because the positive polarity respects free will. It doesn't impose its will on others.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: you are missing the point, maybe intentively.
Not at all. You asked what the mechanism was that prevented negative enslavement. The quote I gave explained how one such mechanism, white magic, works.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: usage of infinite energy to stop others' willed action, is no different than using infinite energy to dominate others, in philosophical principle. with positive philosophy, the entity requesting that protection, or the entities providing that protection with ANY means, be it a wall of light, be it a call in the name of infinite intelligence, should have let that other entity have its way, according to its will.
No. I gave a quote that addressed this earlier. Rejecting the negative offer of enslavement preserves free will.
Quote:67.26 ...You have here a balanced and polarized view of the Creator; two services offered, mutually rejected, and in a state of equilibrium in which free will is preserved and each allowed to go upon its own path of experiencing the One Infinite Creator.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: but its not happening that way. entities, even if it is not the entity who is requesting protection, are acting, and stopping the other entity's will. the other entity, cannot manifest its will. its actions are stopped, not accepted.
Right, and that's a good thing.
(08-12-2010, 02:26 PM)unity100 Wrote: one entity cannot embrace all other entities' dark sides.
That's exactly what you do in seventh density and, correspondingly, in violet-ray work. You embrace all that there is, including all other entities' dark sides.