Session 022

[Bring4th_Austin]

Continuing a re-read of the material with an angle for creating a study group. Any thoughts or ideas about these things would be very useful! Not looking for objective interpretations or a debate, but rather a range of perspectives that will add to my own understanding. If possible, please use the "View Source" function (the button to the far right on the toolbar) and copy+paste each point into it's own quote tags.

---

Thus, entities had discovered many ways to indicate a bellicose nature, not only as tribes or what you call nations but in personal relationships, each with the other, the concept of barter having given way in many cases to the concept of money; also, the concept of ownership having won ascendancy over the concept of non-ownership on an individual or group basis.

Each entity then was offered many more subtle ways of demonstrating either service towards others or service to self with the distortion of the manipulation of others. As each lesson was understood, those lessons of sharing, of giving, of receiving in free gratitude— each lesson could be rejected in practice.

Without demonstrating the fruits of such learn/teaching the life span became greatly reduced, for the ways of honor/duty were not being accepted.

From this, would you say that the concepts of barter and ownership are not in themselves negative in nature, but allow for further learn/teaching that, when not utilized and accepted, then shortened the lifespan?

---

It described in golden words the beauties of love as lived.

What are golden words?

---

There were those peripherally associated with this culture which did not stay. However, they were not able to be harvested either and so, beginning at the very highest, shall we say, of the sub-octaves of third density, repeated this density.

What does this even mean? A group did not stay, but they weren’t harvestable, so they remained…why did they have the choice not to stay? What mechanism of harvest was at work here?

---

The entities repeating the third-density major cycle have, in some few cases, been able to leave. These entities have chosen to join their brothers and sisters, as you would call these entities.

Is Ra referring to the entities “which did not stay,” their brothers and sisters being the 150 who were harvestable?

---

The one known as sound vibration complex, Saint Augustine, is of such a nature. The one known as Saint Teresa of such a nature. The one known as Saint Francis of Assisi of such nature. These entities, being of monastic background, as you would call it, found incarnation in the same type of ambiance appropriate for further learning.

Could it also be that these are part of the group that wasn’t harvestable, but close? Ra said they chose ambiance for “further learning,” which would be more necessary for the non-harvestable group than the harvestable group. Perhaps the harvestable group did not continue incarnating, but remained in the inner planes as teachers and supporters.

---

The Council of Saturn acted only in allowing the entry into third density of other mind/body/spirit complexes of third density, not Wanderers, but those who sought further third-density experience. This was done randomly so that free will would not be violated for there was not yet a call.

Does this just mean 3rd density entities transferring from other 3rd density planets?

Maybe at this point the council said “Well, looks like a bunch of repeaters…let’s let the other repeaters in there with them.”

---

Therefore the temples were temples of learning rather than the attempt being made to totally separate and put upon a pedestal the healers.

Could it be that healers became more synonymous with holy people and priests, and the idea of an elite within religious configurations was spurred from Ra’s interaction with Egypt?