05-31-2015, 08:11 AM
Note to everyone:
I type up most of my posts ahead of time so they're in a form that is what you'd call pedantic so they can be reworked and used in the treatise and curriculum project. More posts to come on this topic.
Hi Researchers
I'm beginning to think that the metamonism concept is a good expression for what Ra was trying to convey as their Law of One. If we were to meet them in the flesh and ask them point blank "What exactly is the Law of One in terms of monisms?" I'm willing to bet that they would describe it as some kind of metamonism -- probably much more integrated and detailed that what I have conjured so far.
The prefix "meta" when applied to a name of a discipline ie psychology or physics produces a more comprehensive and transcending discipline that's designed to go deeper and broader than the original discipline. It covers the original discipline in a both a critical and creatively abstract way that leads to new discoveries.
Metaphysics -- Metapsychology -- Metamathematics -- Metalogic -- Metaethics
So a reevaluation of Ra's Law of One points to being a metamonism that is comprehensive and transcending over any particular monism and, as far as I can tell, is unprecedented in Western or Eastern philosophy. If researched and developed fully into a philosphical treatise it can be the groundbreaking paradigm in mainstream academia and it can make L/L Research a relevant resource for them. This could also result in a smoother transition through 3.8/4.1D.
Note of reference:
IUP is Infinity Unity Principle and IUP = IU + UI
AOP is All One Principle and AOP = AO + OA
IUP = AOP (equivalence)
Infinity is Unity = All is One
Unity is Infinity = One is All
Since the IUP/AOP is a revision of Ra's Law of One, I think that developing it further is integral towards deriving the expanded superstructure of this metamonism in all its key principles and forms of existence through the densities of this octave.
Here's another hypothesis derived from the IUP/AOP and metamonism which encompasses a 3-fold modal cycle as suggested in the OP which suggests the start and return to Existence Monism.
Specifically from IUP = IU + UI, this hypothesis claims:
The "Infinity is Unity" or IU results in Aware or Intelligent Infinity while the "Unity is Infinity" or UI results in Aware or Intelligent Unity. We only hear from Ra about Intelligent Infinity because that is focused on reaching the next octave which I call the Mutable Octave.
The Dialectical Monism of IUP/AOP springs from Intelligent Unity and first emerges as the mover/moved dynamic in the previous octave which I call the Cardinal Octave. It fully develops as a metamonism through the densities of our Fixed Octave. Fixed has to do with formation and stability of principles and forms of existence to allow for our evolution.
Astrology uses these modes -- cardinal, fixed, mutable -- as a natural repeating
cycle of evolution, and I see the octaves as an infinite repeating 3-fold cycle --
Cardinal Octave, Fixed Octave, Mutable Octave -- which follow this evolutionary
trend.
So I go out on a limb and claim that Ra's assumption that there are infinite octaves is true in that it is a infinite series of a repeating 3-fold cycle. How much more primitive could the previous octave be with only the mover/moved dynamic as its crowning result? And how much more advanced can the next octave be as we are to attain total fusion with the Creator and become infinite spiritual mass?
What's the encore to that? None that I can fathom except that this Mutable Octave is also a mutable/incubation phase for a new emergent Cardinal Octave and sets the stage for the next Fixed Octave to again fully express the metamonism through the densities.
Speaking of densities, a later post will go into more speculation of how this
metamonism concept, in tandem with the IUP/AOP, can be shown to necessitate panentheism and panpsychism along with reincarnation, evolution, karma, etc through the densities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's some notes about various monisms for the researcher.
Monism -- reality is in some sense one, unchanging, indivisible, undifferentiable
1. substantial -- the apparent plurality of substance is due to different states of or appearances of a single substance (God/Absolute)
2. attributive -- whatever the number of substances, they are of a single ultimate kind -- there is only one realm of being
3. partial -- within a given realm of being (however many there may be) there is only one substance
Neutral Monism -- mind and matter are reducible to one common substance of which there are phenomenal modifications
Priority Monism -- the One is prior to the plural at the beginning -- eg a circle is prior to its parts ie semicircles, quadrants, points
I type up most of my posts ahead of time so they're in a form that is what you'd call pedantic so they can be reworked and used in the treatise and curriculum project. More posts to come on this topic.
Hi Researchers
I'm beginning to think that the metamonism concept is a good expression for what Ra was trying to convey as their Law of One. If we were to meet them in the flesh and ask them point blank "What exactly is the Law of One in terms of monisms?" I'm willing to bet that they would describe it as some kind of metamonism -- probably much more integrated and detailed that what I have conjured so far.
The prefix "meta" when applied to a name of a discipline ie psychology or physics produces a more comprehensive and transcending discipline that's designed to go deeper and broader than the original discipline. It covers the original discipline in a both a critical and creatively abstract way that leads to new discoveries.
Metaphysics -- Metapsychology -- Metamathematics -- Metalogic -- Metaethics
So a reevaluation of Ra's Law of One points to being a metamonism that is comprehensive and transcending over any particular monism and, as far as I can tell, is unprecedented in Western or Eastern philosophy. If researched and developed fully into a philosphical treatise it can be the groundbreaking paradigm in mainstream academia and it can make L/L Research a relevant resource for them. This could also result in a smoother transition through 3.8/4.1D.
Note of reference:
IUP is Infinity Unity Principle and IUP = IU + UI
AOP is All One Principle and AOP = AO + OA
IUP = AOP (equivalence)
Infinity is Unity = All is One
Unity is Infinity = One is All
Since the IUP/AOP is a revision of Ra's Law of One, I think that developing it further is integral towards deriving the expanded superstructure of this metamonism in all its key principles and forms of existence through the densities of this octave.
Here's another hypothesis derived from the IUP/AOP and metamonism which encompasses a 3-fold modal cycle as suggested in the OP which suggests the start and return to Existence Monism.
Specifically from IUP = IU + UI, this hypothesis claims:
The "Infinity is Unity" or IU results in Aware or Intelligent Infinity while the "Unity is Infinity" or UI results in Aware or Intelligent Unity. We only hear from Ra about Intelligent Infinity because that is focused on reaching the next octave which I call the Mutable Octave.
The Dialectical Monism of IUP/AOP springs from Intelligent Unity and first emerges as the mover/moved dynamic in the previous octave which I call the Cardinal Octave. It fully develops as a metamonism through the densities of our Fixed Octave. Fixed has to do with formation and stability of principles and forms of existence to allow for our evolution.
Astrology uses these modes -- cardinal, fixed, mutable -- as a natural repeating
cycle of evolution, and I see the octaves as an infinite repeating 3-fold cycle --
Cardinal Octave, Fixed Octave, Mutable Octave -- which follow this evolutionary
trend.
So I go out on a limb and claim that Ra's assumption that there are infinite octaves is true in that it is a infinite series of a repeating 3-fold cycle. How much more primitive could the previous octave be with only the mover/moved dynamic as its crowning result? And how much more advanced can the next octave be as we are to attain total fusion with the Creator and become infinite spiritual mass?
What's the encore to that? None that I can fathom except that this Mutable Octave is also a mutable/incubation phase for a new emergent Cardinal Octave and sets the stage for the next Fixed Octave to again fully express the metamonism through the densities.
Speaking of densities, a later post will go into more speculation of how this
metamonism concept, in tandem with the IUP/AOP, can be shown to necessitate panentheism and panpsychism along with reincarnation, evolution, karma, etc through the densities.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Here's some notes about various monisms for the researcher.
Monism -- reality is in some sense one, unchanging, indivisible, undifferentiable
1. substantial -- the apparent plurality of substance is due to different states of or appearances of a single substance (God/Absolute)
2. attributive -- whatever the number of substances, they are of a single ultimate kind -- there is only one realm of being
3. partial -- within a given realm of being (however many there may be) there is only one substance
Neutral Monism -- mind and matter are reducible to one common substance of which there are phenomenal modifications
Priority Monism -- the One is prior to the plural at the beginning -- eg a circle is prior to its parts ie semicircles, quadrants, points