Dewey B. Larson and RST

[Lavazza]

Indeed. The problem with the twin paradox is that it states that at speeds approaching that of light, there is a preferred reference frame which is due to its velocity. This, however, is fundamentally disallowed by general relativity which indicates that there is no way of distinguishing between two reference frames due to their relative velocity. I must confess, that I have forgotten how RST resolved the paradox exactly, but it was related to the fact that our base velocity is at unity, which is the speed of light, not at zero. In general relativity, the discontinuity occurs due to a division by zero that does not occur in RST. I beg your indulgence for some time to reconstruct the discussion by Dewey, and I will post more in the future.

Granted. For any following this thread, here is some more information on this paradox. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twin_paradox

I'll be interested to hear what information you find.

What I find most interesting about this approach is that the way we perceive time in 3D is very much a function of what/how we are focusing our attention, or said another way, on what we are experiencing. If you will indulge me for a few moments, I would love to elaborate:

It sounds like you have invested a good deal of time/space meditation on this subject I would like to comment however that it sounds like you are still only describing linear time, albeit in three different perspectives. Although in all fairness, I think it is a fine theory, and I am none the wiser as regards visualizing the arena of time/space, and perhaps less so, than yourself. For me the explaination doesn't work because it still leaves me blurry on trying to understand the remaining single (linear) dimension of space. That is to say, I imagine the first three dimensions of time as you have stated, with the chi, psi and omega. But I can only imagine it in so far as there are three dimensions of space in which to use those dimensions upon. This of course may be due to my handicap of existing in space/time. And again, I think you're probably on to it when you wrote:

Each moment of our 3D experience then, is the sum of the amount of focus we provide to the experience of our body, our mind and our spirit in that moment. In t/s one can then view any point in linear space based upon our experience of it in these three dimensions

This must be correct as it is a fair reciprocal of our experience here (in s/t), though I can only visualize it to a certain degree and have it still make sense to me. Might I add, that I also really enjoyed your umbrella analogy. The space under the umbrella being our three dimensional space, and the linearly shaped pole in the middle for time. Then closing the umbrella with Hulk Hogan like force, so far that it somehow flipped completely inside out, creating three dimensional time under this inverted umbrella, and the upside down pole being one dimensional space.

I am quite sure that new souls who are preparing to enter first density are having just a hard of a time understanding our space/time as we are of their time/space

Gladly, my friend. The Thread is called "Considerations of s/t and t/s".

See you there soon good friend!

Lavazza

---

Some Monday morning fun.