(08-03-2015, 03:42 AM)The_Tired_Philosopher Wrote: It is interesting to note that at one point Ra states that they have their own style of polarity somewhat different from us. Though it could be that there are subtle measures of polarity or...Microcosmic polarities and macrocosmic polarities inside a single Density (The body has various portions that are differently polarized as an example) as well as an entire overlying Polarity across a full Octave. That's all just speculation, I honestly don't know and there isn't too much that points towards another 'set' of polarities that we utilize in this Density or the various infinite sub-densities of our density. There are hints that polarity varies across Densities, but I'm a bit unsure on if the plain concept of Self/Other-Self is the 'core' of polarity, and the way's of each Density are the subtle manners of Polarizing.
...-cough- Hey thank you, I just figured out something to try and read in to! :)
Ra Wrote:However, we might consider the polarities using slightly variant terms. In this way a possible enrichment of insight might be achieved for some.
I find this portion equally relevant, for me personally. To understand the subtlety of Polarity through 'slightly variant terms' may be helpful (even though I've just taken the quote out of context.) It might be helpful to some to consider in this case a Sun versus a Black Hole (even though a black hole does more than absorb) as synonymous possibly to each polarity in a physical sense. Both do somewhat the same thing, can support an orbiting system, Ra's referenced Black Hole's as a Unification of a sort, and has called the Sun the Logos of our System. Black Hole's can spur and create an entire new Galaxy however, if not they support each Galaxy apparently. While Sun's seem to support smaller systems so this is a bad analogy...
Hmm... Glad I figured that out...
The various phenomena of Polarity is apparent across space and if I could think of some way to emphasis it, time as well. Past/Future, Present/Unpresent perhaps. Forward/Backward, Still/Moving.
Polarity is fascinating to me, I just wish I could make or have a more in-depth understanding of the full universal means of how Polarity interacts with itself.
I imagine, but DO NOT KNOW, and this might be dangerous muddying speculation, but perhaps Polarity has within itself another set of Polarity. Just as inside Yin-Yang exists the dot's of Yang in Yin and Yin in Yang. Polarity might have in it subtle measures of itself sub-polarities furthermore.
But Ra did maintain a simplified means of explanation, similar to how they don't really delve into the infinite sub-densities of third density, it might not be a good idea to look into the sub-polarities of each polarity, if they exist.
Interesting thoughts. Ra often equates polarity with 'the paths', I was wondering what you thought of this particular bit?
Quote:19.16 Questioner: Then, through free will, some time in the third-density experience, the path splits and an entity consciously— probably does not consciously choose. Does an entity consciously choose this path at the initial splitting point?
Ra: I am Ra. We speak in generalities which is dangerous for always inaccurate. However, we realize you look for the overview; so we will eliminate anomalies and speak of majorities.
The majority of third-density beings is far along the chosen path before realization of that path is conscious.
Typically I believe, like you, that polarity is a willed result, something that comes with intention but this quote mixes it up a bit for me because it suggests that most begin polarizing long before they realize it.