Polarity

[The_Tired_Philosopher]

You have talked about free will but the free will you talked about is not Free Will. It is a lower extension/distortion of Free Will, Free Will in itself in my view is something that cannot be infringed upon, it is the Will that allows each infinite paths to exist as a whole and as a way for the Creator to know Itself, it is the first distortion which stands above all others. In my view it is the End that allows itself to Start and move through all experiences in which it has been infringed upon and has infringed upon others. Hence the ever perfect harmony, unity and hence rendering polarity an illusion in itself.

I'm having a bit of a hard time understanding this.

The underlined didn't make sense to me so could you try explaining it differently?  I believe Free Will cannot be violated, but it can be infringed upon, this might be a case of semantics, so while I probably agree with you in all likelihood I just want to clear this issue up instead of debating it.  Do you think Free Will has lesser measures of itself?  I never thought of it in that way similarly to how I never viewed Love and Light as having differentiation's or distortions of themselves in the form or 'lesser' or 'lower' 'extensions/distortions'.

Did you mean to say Free Will in a microcosmic sense (indivi-duality) is what I'm referring to and not the Macrocosmic Free Will or referenced 'Law of Free Will' as it's Primal Distortion of the Law of One?

As for the Bold, this in itself is a measure of Free Will in a distorted sense in my opinion, but we haven't really fleshed out what Free Will is, so I am lost and confused.  The Law of One has Free Will as it's First Primal Distortion, if all things are the One Infinite Creator (who makes up the Law of One) then what would Free Will be classified or explained as?  Just like we have the questions of, What is Light; What is Love; What is Free Will; What IS One?

Maybe we should perform more in-depth thought and consideration/contemplation on what Free Will is before we start speaking so surely of it.  I'll admit I could be wrong in how I referenced Free Will.  Perhaps it'd be better of me to say, 'The Choices Made' rather than the actual 'being-act of Free Will' being utilized.

Maybe we should build a thread on those questions, Primal Questions: What is One, Free Will, Love, Light?

May I just point out how funny it is that you reference in the italicized, that infringement seems to be the only act capable of 'one' performing to 'an-other'.  While Polarity is clearly stated as an illusion, we are still in it, and in this thread I am trying to flesh out subtlety of Polarity, so may I ask you to avoid moving into figuring's and explanations of how Polarity is an illusion?  We've discussed the inherent concepts of Being/Beingness including the concepts of a non-Start cyclical End being possible from an entity 'Just-As-Is-Being' in regards to infinity and awareness.  (I made a rather lengthy thread on this in this forum months back if you remember, not sure I could find it though.)  So let's avoid repeating these things as well for the time being in this thread if that's acceptable with you?

After a point, Polarity will cease, but for now we are within polarity, and while we may not be in a place to understand it in full, my motive for creating this thread is to try and clear up distortions on polarity to grant people some form of freedom in knowledge that they are not alone in misunderstanding, and that they do not need to fret endlessly in confusion.

I'm trying to make sense of Polarity and it's subtle nature's of intertwining without blurring the inter-twined polarities into a whole new level of distortions.  Does that make sense?