01-15-2016, 08:57 AM
Why is the Ra Channeling considered so pure it can't be editted for others ease of reading?
But when you want to change it for help, its wrong??
I find many aspects of the Material to be completely misunderstood by some and totally abused and distorted for ego by others. If not...literally 5-15% of it in word 'choice' and word/intent 'misalignment' so well placed by our darker friends (imo) its not proper to call this Material 'pure' beyond relatively to other channelings.
My first example for misunderstanding or misalignment. A STO entity using a judgmental word like 'impairment' to describe a sensitive aspect of sexuality, in my opinion, the context is misunderstood as impairment of sexual function when it looks closer to impairment of sexual reproduction evolutionarily. Is either perspective wrong though?
I'm.always hunting this Material for these hidden things in plain sight subliminally knocking against us. The dark attacks from the shadow, you won't see it until you're aware of it. Kind of like actual real subliminal messages in advertisements and tv/radio. It exists in the Ra Material distinctly, all the extra ramblings some call it, is psychological aids and clues in.a sense.
The removal of some of that might help some cut to the Heart of this Material. Who's place is it to judge that wrong to do? Its weird the double standards existent even in this community, its a lovely reminder of why I have faith in Humanity (or the better sides of it anyway). Humans are beautiful -shrug-
I.dislike the idea of opaque black boxes, as they always looked like those blacked out censored goverment documents, strikeout, and I'm with Isis here, would be preferred.
I've strikedout much of the LOO until I realized everyone needs to strikeout different parts but many seem to agree on.different variants of strikedout text, you could say there is a version of this Material for everyone.
Since as it is messes people up, maybe removal/addition of distortions will be of more help/harm. I use those terms because everything we do goes both ways no matter what, even for Ra with this Material, it went both ways. Helped and Harmed, was any of it wrong?
I give my Thoughts and Sincere Hopes you pursue this Parson. I have found the Material infinitely differing and helpful from doing such with it.
Its a tool, not a Holy Item, you can mess with it and learn Something new.
(Pre-edit: To clarify regards double standards. Not so much referring to anyone here but the attitude in general that I've seen here regards editing the Ra Material)
But when you want to change it for help, its wrong??
I find many aspects of the Material to be completely misunderstood by some and totally abused and distorted for ego by others. If not...literally 5-15% of it in word 'choice' and word/intent 'misalignment' so well placed by our darker friends (imo) its not proper to call this Material 'pure' beyond relatively to other channelings.
My first example for misunderstanding or misalignment. A STO entity using a judgmental word like 'impairment' to describe a sensitive aspect of sexuality, in my opinion, the context is misunderstood as impairment of sexual function when it looks closer to impairment of sexual reproduction evolutionarily. Is either perspective wrong though?
I'm.always hunting this Material for these hidden things in plain sight subliminally knocking against us. The dark attacks from the shadow, you won't see it until you're aware of it. Kind of like actual real subliminal messages in advertisements and tv/radio. It exists in the Ra Material distinctly, all the extra ramblings some call it, is psychological aids and clues in.a sense.
The removal of some of that might help some cut to the Heart of this Material. Who's place is it to judge that wrong to do? Its weird the double standards existent even in this community, its a lovely reminder of why I have faith in Humanity (or the better sides of it anyway). Humans are beautiful -shrug-
I.dislike the idea of opaque black boxes, as they always looked like those blacked out censored goverment documents, strikeout, and I'm with Isis here, would be preferred.
I've strikedout much of the LOO until I realized everyone needs to strikeout different parts but many seem to agree on.different variants of strikedout text, you could say there is a version of this Material for everyone.
Since as it is messes people up, maybe removal/addition of distortions will be of more help/harm. I use those terms because everything we do goes both ways no matter what, even for Ra with this Material, it went both ways. Helped and Harmed, was any of it wrong?
I give my Thoughts and Sincere Hopes you pursue this Parson. I have found the Material infinitely differing and helpful from doing such with it.
Its a tool, not a Holy Item, you can mess with it and learn Something new.
(Pre-edit: To clarify regards double standards. Not so much referring to anyone here but the attitude in general that I've seen here regards editing the Ra Material)