Technology (or cover-up of technology) lessening the harvest?

[APeacefulWarrior]

I'm not really invested in this line of discussion too much either way, but Ra says there are manmade crafts that are psychotronic weaponry, and that they have been used "in many cases". What would you interpret this to be?

Well, that's what I was saying.  Ra was so vague in his comments that I don't have a concrete interpretation, and I'd advise against jumping too too many conclusions for that exact reason.

For that matter -and I'm just tossing this one out there- remember that Ra said these things over 30 years ago, when technology in a lot of areas was far more primitive than it is today, especially tech in private hands.  And going back to the 50s-60s, it's even more true.   At this point, so much of the planet is being actively monitored by a huge variety of systems, many of which have public access and\or are private science ventures, that such activities would be almost impossible to keep secret.  Even if the government were actively using those technologies decades ago, it's not implausible to suggest they may have had to stop operations as privately-owned tech reached a point their activities would be detected if they persisted.  

(Just consider, for example, how many oceanographers and marine biologists and oil prospectors and more all have microphones and seismographs and EM monitors underwater these days.  They WOULD notice any sort of high-powered broadcasts on pretty much any wavelength. Likewise, there are so many telescopes aimed at the moon that nothing can hide on the light side, and the dark side is useless for any weapons since it always points away from Earth.)

I see your point being that humans shouldn't place the exterior blame on personal circumstances, which is not what I'm advocating, but merely a larger awareness that the game is often rigged against the self acting with free will, for a reason. All humans need to find the internal impetus to act of their own volition.

And I'm just saying there are enough provably-extant sources of this rigging -especially the profit-driven mass media- that there's no good reason to invent other boogeymen without a lot of hard evidence.  If anything, such speculation may actually overestimate how bad things are, which directly plays into the hands of those who profit from fear and paranoia.

After all, I'd say that the worst thing you can do to a negative entity (from their POV) is to love them anyway.  The second-worst thing is to disregard them entirely as irrelevant.  The third-worst is to laugh at them joyfully.  All of these approaches disempower them, and rejects the offer of fear\anger they are making which is at the heart of all negative interactions.  Even taking them seriously is an acceptance of that fear\anger on some level, and any attempt to fight them directly is automatically a negative reaction which furthers their ends. (That's the real paradox of being a warrior of light.)

So I'd suggest picking any of those three approaches.  They are the most overall helpful for positive goals, at least as I see it.