To Austin, Plenum and ETM
I've copied and pasted your posts RE question 17.33 to study further, and may use them in my Ethical Polarity thread.
That's the question I explore in:
A Person's Ethical Focus, Range and Volatility
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=12390
Your input helps to address this multi-faceted topic.
Several years ago I worked out a "roots of Unity" model that attempts to explain the quantitative nature of 51 and 95 as threshold values in 3D. That was always a puzzle b/c why 51 and 95? Why not 55 and 80, or 60 and 75?
I'll try to address this next weekend and put up a graphic of this model in the Ethical Polarity thread.
I've copied and pasted your posts RE question 17.33 to study further, and may use them in my Ethical Polarity thread.
That's the question I explore in:
A Person's Ethical Focus, Range and Volatility
http://www.bring4th.org/forums/showthread.php?tid=12390
Your input helps to address this multi-faceted topic.
Several years ago I worked out a "roots of Unity" model that attempts to explain the quantitative nature of 51 and 95 as threshold values in 3D. That was always a puzzle b/c why 51 and 95? Why not 55 and 80, or 60 and 75?
I'll try to address this next weekend and put up a graphic of this model in the Ethical Polarity thread.