2nd LOO Question: Creation

[Quantum]

...the mechanics of 1d graduation is not known to us in detail, so we cant be sure. if its anything like 6d graduation, all elements constituting a certain spirit collective would need to graduate.

Nothing of graduation or the mechanics thereof of any density are known to us in any detail whatsoever. We are all, by design no less, shooting in the dark. The mechanics of 6D like 1D are as completely unknown to us therefore in any greater detail whatsoever. Ra in fact spoke very little with respect to detail, inclusive of 6D and all other densities, and what they did speak of was at best in vagaries. Ra spoke at most to 3D in greatest detail as would be expected at best. If we are as sorely ignorant about our own sweet home turf of 3D, which is our better ground for theorizing (guessing), then we are clearly more lost as regards ALL other densities above us, as we are below us. All is clouded, shrouded, withheld, and a mystery with intent.

Having made the disclaimer therefore, one might be better served to imagine that 1D is nothing at all like 6D in the following respect as regards your statement "if its (1D) anything like 6d graduation all elements constituting a certain spirit collective would need to graduate": by your vernacular of "a certain spirit collective" I assume you to interpretively mean, speaking by Ra's vernacular, "a Social Memory Complex." It seems logical to infer that 1D is without capacity of such. A rock is a rock in 1D without the benefit of social interaction to even begin to form a SMC which we in 3D have even yet to reach. Surely it seems logical to suggest that 1D is not capable of surpassing 3D in this respect. Therefore it seems as logical to assume the comparative analysis of 1D to 6D as a gross mis-step if one may not even do so with 3D to 6D as regards specifically "a certain spirit collective" aka "a Social Memory Complex." Wouldn't you agree?

Secondly, even if one were to allow for your logic, it changes nothing with respect to the original question as regards the laggards. Whether "a rock of one", or "a rock of many as a collective consciousness," a rock may still be lagging in its use of utilizing experience efficiently such that "one rock" or "many rocks as one complex" may still nonetheless lag for billions of years. The same may be said of 6D as well in as much as one SMC may lag longer than another in 6D, less 6D would become a vacuum in which all of 6D graduates at once and then waits to be refilled so that all may graduate at once again.

If the thought experimental rock lags to the extent that it and the thought experimental roach have, either for billions of years, it is by our standards extremely slow. If as you seemingly suggest, the rock has a finite schedule for being a rock of many, or one, then what replaces the rocks of many or one but more newly created rocks of many or one, less we would run out of rocks. It becomes circular. It would seem that creation continues creating.

there is an important detail in the concept of 'all things in infinity are infinitely possible' -> there are infinite possibilities and everything exists, however, everything need not be necessarily in the current reality collective/locale you are in. another 'locale' in infinity may be having a certain x version of your reality, whereas, elements from that are missing in the one you are in.

Given my last attempt to enter into a dialog with you on your previous thread in which I ended up engaging with another participant instead without the benefit of your input, I am somewhat willing with trepidation to "shortly" tread into a discussion with you on your sentiments as regards "Infinity" as a means of lovingly rectifying what was derailed, but would request that perhaps we do so by picking it up on your previous thread to avert the risk of derailing this one. Feel free to cut my question below here and paste it there. To that end: on the one hand it seems you repeatedly suggest that all is infinitely possible within infinity. It seems at face value to hold truth. But do you truly believe this in every single infinite aspect of it?

* Will the rock and the cockroach ultimately become a 3D being and then ultimately a Logos, and if so what is their problem in their lack of speed in staying with the program if we all started off at the same time?

i have missed that. its important. it seems that you think a cockroach will ultimately become a 3d being, and then, ultimately a logos. the last part is important....so you think, entities end up becoming logoses ?

Here we are again with your own question with respect to your own previous sentiments as regards Infinity staring you back in the mirror. Do you believe in every single aspect of what you propose? If yes, then it is a short reply. If there are exceptions, then I would be most open to hearing what they are, and as importantly how it is you would propose to restrict what you have suggested is otherwise infinite.


Looking forward to your response on your infinity thread where I will join you on what I hope will be a short discourse, rather than a circular one without end.

...L/L...
~ Q ~