(03-03-2016, 09:48 PM)anagogy Wrote:(03-03-2016, 09:38 PM)Min yatur Wrote: What is more in alignment with unity?
To give yourself the right to be what you are? or denying this right for the sake of others?
I don't think they are mutually exclusive. What we really are is, collectively, the one infinite creator. So to treat others with equality is catering to the true self. Catering to the little self to the exclusion of others, is catering to the little self over the greater self.
I believe everyone is ever true to itself, if you deny yourself for others then it is what is true to yourself. If you deny others for yourself, then it is also just what is true to yourself.
I'd disagree about the notion of little/greater self, within the little self is focused all of the greater self. Just as All is One, One is also All.
(03-03-2016, 09:48 PM)anagogy Wrote:(03-03-2016, 09:38 PM)Min yatur Wrote: The "as you yourself would want to be treated" is quite good though. Yet no one said the negative path is just about stepping upon others, you'd get quite your own share of being stepped upon and usually don't just end up on it like that because you one day made the choice to because it seemed fun.
What tells you they don't treat others as they want to be treated? Sure there's positive entities trying to send them love, mindless love which knows not a thing about them and does more of hurting than healing. Seems not like how they want to be treated to me.
To polarize negatively, you have to step on others. You have to control them. I don't know about you, but I don't like to be controlled.
Well under the cause and effect and path of experiences which did bring forth your current experience of yourself I guess not. Through each and every single entity's path of experiences that lead toward negative densities, I guess you did.